NVIDIA NemoClaw CKG
NVIDIA NemoClaw knowledge graph — 55 nodes, F1 0.576 (+269% vs RAG), 11x fewer tokens. MCP-native.
Sollte ich dies verwenden
Qualität und Sicherheit
Basierend auf einer automatisierten Analyse der Tool-Definitionen und der Einhaltung des Protokolls.
Kontextkosten
Dies ist die ungefähre Anzahl der Tokens, die jedes Mal verbraucht werden, wenn die Tools des Servers in den Kontext eines Modells geladen werden. Höhere Werte verringern die Aufmerksamkeit, die für andere Aufgaben verfügbar ist.
Installieren
Installation mit einem Klick
Fügen Sie dies Ihrer Datei `claude_desktop_config.json` hinzu:
{
"mcpServers": {
"ckg-nvidia-nemoclaw": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"ckg-nvidia-nemoclaw"
]
}
}
}Ausführbare Pakete
0.10.3stdioRemote-Endpunkte
https://ckg-nvidia-nemoclaw.onrender.com/mcpstreamable-httpWas es kann
Tool-Inventar
Tools (8)
⚪ask_nemoclaw(question)
Answer a question about NVIDIA NemoClaw by traversing the knowledge graph. Covers: agent runtimes (OpenClaw/Hermes/Deep Agents), OpenShell platform, inference routing, network policy, security layers, deployment paths, progressive tool disclosure, managed MCP servers, snapshots, shields, FOX Blueprint, Nemotron 3 Ultra ecosystem, and platform support. Args: question: Your question about NemoClaw concepts or architecture.
Eingabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"question": {
"title": "Question",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"question"
],
"title": "ask_nemoclawArguments"
}Ausgabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"result": {
"title": "Result",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"result"
],
"title": "ask_nemoclawOutput"
}🟢query_ckg(concept, depth)
Return the typed subgraph around a NemoClaw concept. Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label (e.g. 'OpenClaw', 'NetworkPolicy', 'L7Proxy'). depth: Traversal hops (1–5, default 3).
Eingabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"concept": {
"title": "Concept",
"type": "string"
},
"depth": {
"default": 3,
"title": "Depth",
"type": "integer"
}
},
"required": [
"concept"
],
"title": "query_ckgArguments"
}Ausgabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"result": {
"title": "Result",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"result"
],
"title": "query_ckgOutput"
}🟢get_prerequisites(concept)
Return the full upstream prerequisite chain for a NemoClaw concept. Useful for understanding what a concept depends on end-to-end. Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label.
Eingabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"concept": {
"title": "Concept",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"concept"
],
"title": "get_prerequisitesArguments"
}Ausgabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"result": {
"title": "Result",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"result"
],
"title": "get_prerequisitesOutput"
}🟢search_concepts(query)
Fuzzy search for NemoClaw concepts by name or keyword. Args: query: Partial name or keyword (e.g. 'policy', 'inference', 'agent').
Eingabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"query": {
"title": "Query",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"query"
],
"title": "search_conceptsArguments"
}Ausgabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"result": {
"title": "Result",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"result"
],
"title": "search_conceptsOutput"
}🟢list_domains
List available domains in this CKG server.
Eingabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {},
"title": "list_domainsArguments"
}Ausgabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"result": {
"title": "Result",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"result"
],
"title": "list_domainsOutput"
}🟡verify_source(concept)
Return the authoritative source URL and content hash for a NemoClaw concept node. Every node in the CKG was declared from a specific source document. This tool returns the source URL (where the node came from) and the SHA-256 hash of that document's bytes at extraction time. A hash mismatch on re-fetch means either the source has changed (stale edge — re-extract) or the graph was patched without re-fetching (silent edit — investigate). Audit chain: edge answer → graph commit → source_hash → source_url (fetch hint) Verification: curl -s <source_url> | sha256sum # compare output to source_hash Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label (e.g. 'CorporateCA', 'L7Proxy').
Eingabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"concept": {
"title": "Concept",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"concept"
],
"title": "verify_sourceArguments"
}Ausgabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"result": {
"title": "Result",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"result"
],
"title": "verify_sourceOutput"
}🟢route_query(question)
Route a NemoClaw question to the optimal model and reasoning approach via graph depth. The CKG graph IS the router. NemoClaw's dependency chains (e.g. OpenShell → L7Proxy → CorporateCA → mTLS) are deep and typed — hop depth is a deterministic complexity signal. No heuristic: the graph decides which model and reasoning approach to use. Routing table: hop_depth 1 → haiku · direct (single concept lookup) hop_depth 2 → sonnet · generic_cot (moderate chain) hop_depth 3+ → opus · sparql_cot (deep chain, structured reasoning required) Args: question: Concept name or natural language question about NemoClaw / OpenShell. Returns: model_tier + reasoning_approach + why + context subgraph to inject before LLM call.
Eingabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"question": {
"title": "Question",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"question"
],
"title": "route_queryArguments"
}Ausgabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"result": {
"title": "Result",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"result"
],
"title": "route_queryOutput"
}🟡query_intersect(branches, depth, direction, mode, limit)
Answer a conjunctive query: concepts reachable from EVERY anchor at once (A AND B). query_ckg walks outward from one concept. This intersects the reachable sets of two or more, which is the shape of most real questions — "the component that satisfies A AND applies to B". Neither anchor alone answers it; the answer lives in the overlap. Every branch is an exact set of declared edges, so the intersection is exact. A concept appears only if a declared path reaches it from each anchor. A relation missing from the graph produces an empty result, never a guess. Args: branches: Two or more branches. Either a bare anchor ("TensorRT-LLM"), which takes everything within `depth` hops, or an anchor plus an explicit relation path using '>' ("TensorRT-LLM > REQUIRES > ENABLES"), where each relation replaces the frontier. '*' matches any relation. Mix both forms freely. depth: Hops for bare-anchor branches, 1-5 (default 2). Ignored for explicit paths. direction: 'out' follows dependencies, 'in' follows them backwards, 'both' (default). mode: 'AND' (default) intersects branches; 'OR' unions them. limit: Max concepts listed, 1-200 (default 40). The true count is always shown. Returns: Markdown with the query plan and its per-step set sizes, then the answer set with taxonomy tags. Reports which branch was empty when the intersection is empty.
Eingabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"branches": {
"items": {
"type": "string"
},
"title": "Branches",
"type": "array"
},
"depth": {
"default": 2,
"title": "Depth",
"type": "integer"
},
"direction": {
"default": "both",
"title": "Direction",
"type": "string"
},
"mode": {
"default": "AND",
"title": "Mode",
"type": "string"
},
"limit": {
"default": 40,
"title": "Limit",
"type": "integer"
}
},
"required": [
"branches"
],
"title": "query_intersectArguments"
}Ausgabe-Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"result": {
"title": "Result",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"result"
],
"title": "query_intersectOutput"
}Community
Nachweis