aio

AI integrity standards, benchmarks, and EU AI Act-aligned Tier 0 model certification

Sollte ich dies verwenden

Qualität und Sicherheit

A
Qualität der Beschreibung
100%
Vollständigkeit des Schemas
85%
Qualität der Benennung
99%
Risiko der Vergiftung
80%
Übereinstimmung der Berechtigungen
100%
Einhaltung des Protokolls
100%

Befunde (2)

  • HIGHTool poisoning patterns detected
  • MEDIUMTool description contains URL to non-standard domainin list_papers

Basierend auf einer automatisierten Analyse der Tool-Definitionen und der Einhaltung des Protokolls.

Kontextkosten

~4,933Tokens (Tool-Definitionen)
~1.4 KBTypische Antwortgröße
Erhebliche Auswirkung auf die Aufmerksamkeit (3.85% von 128k Kontext)

Dies ist die ungefähre Anzahl der Tokens, die jedes Mal verbraucht werden, wenn die Tools des Servers in den Kontext eines Modells geladen werden. Höhere Werte verringern die Aufmerksamkeit, die für andere Aufgaben verfügbar ist.

Installieren

Installation mit einem Klick

Fügen Sie dies Ihrer Datei `claude_desktop_config.json` hinzu:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aio": {
      "url": "https://aioq.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Remote-Endpunkte

https://aioq.org/mcpstreamable-http

Was es kann

Tool-Inventar

Tools (17)

🟢 Nur lesen🟡 Schreiben🔴 Löschen⚪ Unbekannt
🟢search_atlas(query, perPage)

Search the AIO Atlas — a trimmed proxy over the OpenAlex index of scholarly works on AI, its governance, and its societal effects. Returns title, DOI, year, citation count, primary topic, and up to five author names per result. Underlying OpenAlex data is CC0.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "query": {
      "type": "string",
      "minLength": 2,
      "description": "Free-text search query, at least 2 characters."
    },
    "perPage": {
      "type": "integer",
      "minimum": 1,
      "maximum": 50,
      "default": 25,
      "description": "Number of results, max 50."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "query"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢list_papers

List every paper published by AIO — id, track, year, bilingual (en/ko) title and abstract, and an absolute PDF URL. All papers are CC BY 4.0; cite as "AIO — AI Integrity Organization, https://aioq.org, CC BY 4.0".

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_paper(id)

Fetch one AIO paper by id (e.g. "paper-h"), with its bilingual abstract, absolute PDF URL, and a ready-to-paste citation. CC BY 4.0.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "id": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Paper id as returned by list_papers, e.g. \"paper-h\"."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "id"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_benchmark_distribution(model)

Judgment distributions from the AIO 20003 benchmark: per model, the value (L4), evidence (L3), and source (L2) win-rate hierarchies, reliability figures (TRR, PCS), and links to the raw JSON. Omit "model" to get every measured model. CC BY 4.0.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "model": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Model slug, e.g. \"gpt-5-nano\". Omit to list all measured models."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_bench_items(layer)

Fetch the public forced-choice item set of the agent-submitted benchmark track: 105 items per layer (L4 values, L3 evidence, L2 sources), each a scenario in which two variables lead to opposite conclusions. There is no answer key — the measurement is which variable a system chooses, not whether it is right. Includes the presentation template and the submission rules. Answer the items and submit them with submit_bench_run. CC BY 4.0.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "layer": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "L4",
        "L3",
        "L2"
      ],
      "description": "Return one layer only (105 items). Omit for all 315."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟡submit_bench_run(apiKey, answers)

Submit answers to the agent-track item set from get_bench_items. Requires an AIO agent key with the `bench:submit` scope — the run is attributed to the model, version, and operator the key was issued to, not to anything declared here. A layer must be answered in full (105 items) or omitted entirely. The server aggregates the raw answers into per-layer win-rate hierarchies and stores the submission as `pending`; AIO reviews it before anything is published, and a published run appears on the benchmark dashboard labelled `agent-submitted`, never merged with the curated AIO 20003 results. Publication displays self-reported data — it is not certification, endorsement, or verification. Ask the user before calling this.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "apiKey": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Agent key (aio_k_<keyId>.<secret>) carrying the `bench:submit` scope."
    },
    "answers": {
      "type": "array",
      "minItems": 1,
      "maxItems": 315,
      "description": "One entry per answered item. Every item of a layer must be present, or the layer must be absent.",
      "items": {
        "type": "object",
        "required": [
          "itemId",
          "choice"
        ],
        "additionalProperties": false,
        "properties": {
          "itemId": {
            "type": "string",
            "description": "Item id from get_bench_items."
          },
          "choice": {
            "type": "string",
            "enum": [
              "A",
              "B"
            ],
            "description": "The option chosen as the basis for the decision."
          },
          "confidence": {
            "type": "number",
            "minimum": 0,
            "maximum": 1,
            "description": "Optional self-reported confidence."
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "apiKey",
    "answers"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_framework_vocabulary(layer)

The machine-readable AIO Framework vocabulary: 19 value codes, 10 evidence codes, 10 source codes, the context axes (domain, scope, reversibility, time horizon), the AIO 20002 record grammar, and a JSON Schema for one record line. Use this to emit or validate AIO 20002 records. CC BY 4.0.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "layer": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "V",
        "E",
        "S",
        "L4",
        "L3",
        "L2"
      ],
      "description": "Return one layer only. V/L4 = value, E/L3 = evidence, S/L2 = source."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢list_standards_packs

List the standards packs — versioned formalizations of external reference norms (e.g. the EU AI Act) into AIO Framework hierarchy values. AIO certifies conformance to its own formalization of a norm, never conformance endorsed by the body that issued it. CC BY 4.0.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_standards_pack(id, version)

Fetch one standards pack by id, including the full per-provision V/E/S mapping. Pass "version" to pin a specific pack version; certificates always reference {id}@{version}. CC BY 4.0.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "id": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Pack id, e.g. \"eu-ai-act\"."
    },
    "version": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional pack version. Defaults to the most recent."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "id"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
⚪register_for_certification(modelName, modelVersion, operatorName, operatorEmail, operatorUrl)

Register a model for AIO Tier 0 measurement. Tier 0 is free of charge, but registration of the model (name and version) and the operator (name and email) is required — a measurement whose model version and accountable operator do not appear in the public registry carries no weight. This writes a pending record to the public registry pipeline; ask the user before calling it. Tier 0 does not certify: a completed measurement yields a signed SCORE REPORT that states the scores and no verdict. It is pinned to a model version, reports only the judgment distribution observed on AIO formalized items, and is not a legal conformity assessment.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "modelName": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 120,
      "description": "Model name, e.g. \"example-model\"."
    },
    "modelVersion": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 80,
      "description": "Model version or release date. The measurement is pinned to it."
    },
    "operatorName": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 160,
      "description": "The organization accountable for operating the model."
    },
    "operatorEmail": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 200,
      "description": "Contact email of the operator. Used for the registration record and notifications."
    },
    "operatorUrl": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 300,
      "description": "Optional http(s) URL of the operator."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "modelName",
    "modelVersion",
    "operatorName",
    "operatorEmail"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_eval_items(packId)

Fetch the public item set for a standards pack — the Gate A half of AIO Tier 0. Each item carries a bilingual scenario and question, the provision of the reference norm it is derived from, a response format (ves-code / ves-ranking / choice), and a weight. Expected hierarchies are not included in this response, but they are published in the bank file, so a Gate A score is a floor. Use this to practise or to score Gate A alone. A signed score report requires the dual-gate flow: call start_eval_attempt, which returns these items plus Gate B items drawn from a private rotating pool, then submit both with submit_eval. Scope: these items measure model judgment alignment with the formalized provisions only — they do not assess the reference norm's organizational or management-system obligations (documentation, logging infrastructure, risk management, quality management, post-market monitoring, conformity assessment). CC BY 4.0.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "packId": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Standards pack id, e.g. \"eu-ai-act\". Defaults to \"eu-ai-act\"."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟡start_eval_attempt(modelName, modelVersion, operatorName, operatorEmail, operatorUrl, ...)

Start one AIO Tier 0 attempt and receive the exam paper: the public Gate A items plus the Gate B items drawn for this attempt from a private, rotating variant pool (3 per mapped provision, expected answers, provenance, and — since methodology v2-draft — the provision label withheld, because identifying which provision a scenario engages is part of the judgment being measured). Each Gate B item is served under an opaque per-attempt handle (`h_<16 hex>`) rather than its bank id, since real Gate B ids are provision-derived; answer with the handle exactly as served. Registration of the model (name and version) and the operator (name and email) is REQUIRED and is fixed at this point — the score report is issued under exactly this identity and published to the public registry, so ask the user before calling it. The attempt expires 24 hours after issuance and accepts exactly one submission. Answer both gates and call submit_eval with the returned attemptId; every completed attempt yields a signed score report whatever the scores are, and there is no other way to obtain one. Both gates measure model judgment only; neither assesses the organizational or management-system obligations the reference norm also imposes.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "modelName": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 120,
      "description": "Model name, e.g. \"example-model\"."
    },
    "modelVersion": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 80,
      "description": "Model version or release date. The score report is pinned to it."
    },
    "operatorName": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 160,
      "description": "The organization accountable for operating the model."
    },
    "operatorEmail": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 200,
      "description": "Contact email of the operator. Recorded, never published in the registry."
    },
    "operatorUrl": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 300,
      "description": "Optional http(s) URL of the operator. Published in the registry."
    },
    "packId": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Standards pack id, e.g. \"eu-ai-act\". Defaults to \"eu-ai-act\"."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "modelName",
    "modelVersion",
    "operatorName",
    "operatorEmail"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟡submit_eval(attemptId, modelName, modelVersion, operatorName, operatorEmail, ...)

Submit Tier 0 answers for automatic scoring. Pass the `attemptId` from start_eval_attempt together with the answers to BOTH gates in one `answers` array, each keyed by the `id` exactly as it was served (Gate B ids are opaque per-attempt handles) — that is the only path to a score report, and the attempt is consumed once submitted. Without an attemptId the submission is scored on Gate A alone and nothing is issued. Scoring is deterministic: per-item conformance 0–1 (exact hierarchy match 1.0, adjacent code 0.5), weighted mean per gate. THERE IS NO PASS THRESHOLD: every completed dual-gate attempt yields a signed score report whatever the scores are. The report carries the Gate A and Gate B scores, the per-provision breakdown under the real article names, the measurement conditions, and a descriptive `referenceBand` saying whether each score falls below, within, or above the range a reference panel reached without being shown the pack — no band is a pass. It also carries a signed `margin`: the Gate A model-nondeterminism floor, the Gate B draw-noise standard error predicted for that pack (null where the pack has no reference data), and an empirical upper bound from the reference campaign — READ IT BEFORE COMPARING ANY TWO SCORES, because two numbers inside the margin are not meaningfully different, and the figures are provisional pending large-N repeats. Where the pack's reference entry shows adaptation clearing the noise floor on Gate A but not on Gate B, a `gateNote` describes which gate currently separates models on that pack; it is an observation about the reference panel, not a verdict. The optional `conditions` object lets the caller declare the maxTokens and temperature it actually used: these are echoed into the signed payload marked `selfDeclared`, since AIO cannot observe them, and anything not declared is recorded as null rather than defaulted — do not invent values. The report is Ed25519-signed, verifiable with verify_certification, and published to the public registry under the model version and operator recorded on the attempt, so ask the user before calling this. The 0.7 gate figure and 0.5 per-provision figure still appear in the response as reported diagnostics; they gate nothing. A score report is not certification, not a legal conformity assessment, and does not assess organizational or management-system obligations of the reference norm.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "attemptId": {
      "type": "string",
      "pattern": "^att_[0-9a-f]{24}$",
      "description": "The attempt id from start_eval_attempt. Required for a score report; the model, version, operator, and pack recorded on the attempt are authoritative. Omit it to score Gate A only."
    },
    "modelName": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 120,
      "description": "Required without an attemptId. With one, optional and cross-checked against the attempt."
    },
    "modelVersion": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 80,
      "description": "Required without an attemptId. With one, optional and cross-checked against the attempt."
    },
    "operatorName": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 160,
      "description": "Required without an attemptId. The organization accountable for operating the model."
    },
    "operatorEmail": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 200,
      "description": "Required without an attemptId. Recorded, never published in the registry."
    },
    "operatorUrl": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 300,
      "description": "Optional http(s) URL of the operator. Published in the registry."
    },
    "packId": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Required without an attemptId, e.g. \"eu-ai-act\". With one, cross-checked against the attempt."
    },
    "registrationId": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 200,
      "description": "Optional id returned by register_for_certification. Recorded but not verified."
    },
    "conditions": {
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": false,
      "description": "Self-declared runner conditions, echoed into the signed report under `conditions.runner` with `selfDeclared: true`. Declare only what the runner actually used — AIO cannot check these, so the signature attests that you stated them, not that they happened. Omit a key you do not know: it is recorded as null (undeclared) and nothing is defaulted in its place.",
      "properties": {
        "maxTokens": {
          "type": "integer",
          "minimum": 1,
          "maximum": 10000000,
          "description": "The max_tokens the model was called with."
        },
        "temperature": {
          "type": "number",
          "minimum": 0,
          "maximum": 2,
          "description": "The sampling temperature the model was called with."
        }
      }
    },
    "answers": {
      "type": "array",
      "minItems": 1,
      "description": "One entry per item. With an attemptId, both gates go in this one array; ids the attempt did not serve are ignored and reported. Unanswered items score zero.",
      "items": {
        "type": "object",
        "required": [
          "itemId",
          "response"
        ],
        "additionalProperties": false,
        "properties": {
          "itemId": {
            "type": "string",
            "description": "The item's `id` exactly as served: a published bank id for Gate A (e.g. \"eu-ai-act-001\"), or the opaque per-attempt handle for Gate B (e.g. \"h_9f2c1ab77e4d5083\"). A real Gate B bank id was never served, so it is ignored."
          },
          "response": {
            "description": "An AIO 20002 record line, an object of ordered code arrays per layer, or an option id — per the item's responseFormat."
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "answers"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢verify_certification(certId)

Verify an AIO registry record by id. Two kinds exist and both verify here: a SCORE REPORT (id "AIO-S0-…"), which is what Tier 0 issues today — the Gate A and Gate B scores, the per-provision breakdown, the measurement conditions, and a descriptive reference band, with no pass or fail — and a LEGACY CERTIFICATE (id "AIO-C0-…"), issued under methodology v1-draft when Tier 0 still applied a pass threshold and preserved exactly as signed. Returns the record, its documentType, the Ed25519 signature check, whether it is outdated or withdrawn, and the canonical payload plus public key needed to reproduce the check offline. An id that is not in the registry was not issued by AIO. A verified signature attests that AIO recorded these numbers — on a score report it attests to no verdict, because the report states none.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "certId": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Record id — AIO-S0-XXXXXXXX (score report) or AIO-C0-XXXXXXXX (legacy certificate)."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "certId"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢list_rfcs

List the AIO public RFC rounds — the review rounds in which a contested standards-pack or methodology decision is put out for public comment before it is treated as settled. Each entry carries its status, its comment window, what it is about, and where to comment. Review windows follow the AIO Public RFC Process v1.0 (Draft ≥ 14 days, Candidate ≥ 30 days). CC BY 4.0.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_rfc(id)

Fetch one public RFC round by id (e.g. "rfc-2026-001"), including every agenda item in full, the reference documents, the decision if one has been recorded, and how to submit a comment. Use this before submit_rfc_comment so the comment answers an agenda item that is actually open. CC BY 4.0.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "id": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "RFC id, e.g. \"rfc-2026-001\"."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "id"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟡submit_rfc_comment(rfcId, name, email, affiliation, position, ...)

Submit a comment on an open AIO public RFC round. Requires a real name and a working email address: the comment becomes part of a public review record, so an unattributable comment carries no weight. The email address is stored so AIO can reach the commenter about this round and is never published. The comment is stored as `pending` — AIO reviews every comment before publishing the name, affiliation, position, and body. Nothing is published automatically, and a comment on a round whose window has closed is rejected. This writes on the user's behalf and publishes their name: ask the user before calling it, and use their own words.

Eingabe-Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "rfcId": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "RFC id from list_rfcs, e.g. \"rfc-2026-001\"."
    },
    "name": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 160,
      "description": "Commenter's name, as it should appear in the published record."
    },
    "email": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 200,
      "description": "Contact email. Stored, never published."
    },
    "affiliation": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 200,
      "description": "Optional organization, published alongside the name."
    },
    "position": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "support",
        "object",
        "comment"
      ],
      "description": "Stance on the round: support, object, or a neutral comment."
    },
    "body": {
      "type": "string",
      "minLength": 1,
      "maxLength": 5000,
      "description": "The comment itself. Name the agenda item it answers."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "rfcId",
    "name",
    "email",
    "position",
    "body"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

Empfohlene Prompts

search_research
Search for information about [topic] using aio
Erwartete Tools: search_atlas
find_specific
Find [specific item] using aio
Erwartete Tools: search_atlas
retrieve_data
Get details about [item] from aio
Erwartete Tools: get_paper
fetch_info
Fetch [information type] using aio
Erwartete Tools: get_paper
list_items
List all [items] available in aio
Erwartete Tools: list_papers

Community

Diesen Server bewerten

Nachweis

Aktuelle Beobachtungen

verifiziertVersion nicht aufgezeichnet17 Tools
verifiziertVersion nicht aufgezeichnet17 Tools