lp-placement

PancakeSwap V3 fee tiers of a BSC token, free; tier and range plan paid, or free holding 1M $BOBAI.

Should I use this

Quality & Safety

B
Description quality
75%
Schema completeness
95%
Naming quality
80%
Poisoning risk
80%
Permission match
100%
Protocol compliance
100%

Findings (3)

  • HIGHTool poisoning patterns detected
  • MEDIUMTool description contains URL to non-standard domainin lp_tier_plan
  • LOWTool 'pancakeswap_fee_tiers' description lacks action verbin pancakeswap_fee_tiers

Based on automated analysis of tool definitions and protocol compliance.

Context Cost

~555Tokens (tool definitions)
~464 BTypical response size
Minimal attention impact (0.43% of 128k context)

This is the approximate number of tokens consumed each time the server's tools are loaded into a model's context. Higher counts reduce the attention available for other tasks.

Install

One-Click Install

Add this to your `claude_desktop_config.json` file:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lp-placement": {
      "url": "https://agent.brainonbnb.com/lp-placement/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Remote endpoints

https://agent.brainonbnb.com/lp-placement/mcpstreamable-http

What it can do

Tool inventory

Tools (2)

🟢 Read-only🟡 Write🔴 Delete⚪ Unknown
🟢pancakeswap_fee_tiers(address)

Liquidity placement, the free half: the up-to-five PancakeSwap pools a pair lives in and which fee tier is actually paying its liquidity providers. The paid half places a position in the tier that pays.

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "address": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "A BEP-20 token address on BNB Chain (0x…)"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "address"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢lp_tier_plan(task)

Which PancakeSwap fee tier is actually paying its liquidity providers, the paid half (0.10 USD1, or half that in $BOBAI, or nothing for a wallet holding 1,000,000 $BOBAI (holder pass over x402: a signature, no transaction — terms in the reply)): A pair on PancakeSwap lives in up to five pools at once — V2 at 0.25% and V3 at 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.25% and 1.00% — and every interface ranks them by the money already parked in them, which is not what they pay. This measures each tier over a live window: turnover, the fees the pool actually paid out, and what your capital would have earned in each, both sides of the pool counted. And it does the sum the way the money actually works: fees go to the liquidity standing where the trade happens, so each tier is also read at the price — the tick book of the pool itself is walked to find what is parked within a couple of percent of it — with your own size in the denominator, because arriving is what dilutes it. On a constant-product pool that is under one percent of the balance, so the tier holding the most money is regularly not the tier you would be competing with least. It names the tiers holding real money that did not trade at all, and states how long the better tier would have to keep paying before a move pays for its own gas. Not annualised: the window travels with every figure. Calling this tool returns the terms; the answer is sold over x402 at https://agent.brainonbnb.com/answer?service=lp_tier_plan (or hired through the ERC-8183 escrow for 0.10 $U).

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "task": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "What you want, with the address in it"
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": true
}

Community

Rate this Server

Evidence

Recent observations

verifiedversion not recorded2 tools