loe-exposure

Drug patent expiries ranked by the Medicare Part D spending exposed to them

Should I use this

Quality & Safety

A
Description quality
100%
Schema completeness
90%
Naming quality
80%
Poisoning risk
100%
Permission match
100%
Protocol compliance
100%

Based on automated analysis of tool definitions and protocol compliance.

Context Cost

~180Tokens (tool definitions)
~606 BTypical response size
Minimal attention impact (0.14% of 128k context)

This is the approximate number of tokens consumed each time the server's tools are loaded into a model's context. Higher counts reduce the attention available for other tasks.

Install

One-Click Install

Add this to your `claude_desktop_config.json` file:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "loe-exposure": {
      "url": "https://rxfinder.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Remote endpoints

https://rxfinder.ai/mcpstreamable-http

What it can do

Tool inventory

Tools (1)

🟢 Read-only🟡 Write🔴 Delete⚪ Unknown
🟢loss_of_exclusivity_exposure(window, limit)

Rank upcoming FDA Orange Book patent and exclusivity expiries BY the gross Medicare Part D spending exposed to them, with marketed-generic status for each ranked drug resolved from live CMS NADAC price evidence. Answers which expiries matter, not merely which come first. Reports EXPOSURE, never forecast savings. Spending is gross of manufacturer rebates. Orange Book small molecules only, so biologics — among the largest Part D line items — are excluded, and the headline total must not be read as spending that will "go generic".

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "window": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Months ahead to include, default 24"
    },
    "limit": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "How many drugs to rank, default 25"
    }
  },
  "required": []
}

Community

Rate this Server

Evidence

Recent observations

verifiedversion not recorded1 tools
verifiedversion not recorded1 tools