ipnex
Cited, confidence-stamped patent intelligence over US university tech-transfer out-licensing.
Should I use this
Quality & Safety
Based on automated analysis of tool definitions and protocol compliance.
Context Cost
This is the approximate number of tokens consumed each time the server's tools are loaded into a model's context. Higher counts reduce the attention available for other tasks.
Install
One-Click Install
Add this to your `claude_desktop_config.json` file:
{
"mcpServers": {
"ipnex": {
"url": "https://ipnex.onrender.com/mcp"
}
}
}Remote endpoints
https://ipnex.onrender.com/mcpstreamable-httphttps://api.ipnex.ai/mcpstreamable-httpWhat it can do
Tool inventory
Tools (2)
🟢search_licensable_ip(institution, status, keyword, min_confidence, limit, ...)
Search published, licensable US university patent technologies. Answers 'what currently-Active US university IP is licensable from X?'. Every result is cited (Google Patents / USPTO), confidence-stamped, and carries an 'ownership' signal flagging whether the patent's current assignee of record is the marketing institution or a third party, a 'status' interpretation flagging public-domain (term-expired) vs revivable fee-lapsed vs in-force patents, and an 'expiry' reading of how many years of exclusive term remain (expired / expiring_soon / active_term). The response also carries 'facets' -- corpus-level breakdowns over all matches by ownership, institution, status, status_detail, and expiry (the whole-query split, without paging). Patent data: Google Patents (CC BY 4.0) + USPTO (public domain). Summaries are IPNEX-authored. TTO listing content is linked, not reproduced.
Input Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"institution": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Marketing institution substring, e.g. 'Wisconsin', 'Stanford'."
},
"status": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Legal-status substring, e.g. 'Active', 'Expired'."
},
"keyword": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Substring matched against the title and our summary."
},
"min_confidence": {
"type": "number",
"minimum": 0,
"maximum": 1,
"description": "Drop results below this join confidence (0-1)."
},
"limit": {
"type": "integer",
"minimum": 1,
"description": "Max results to return (confidence-sorted)."
},
"licensable_from_institution": {
"type": "boolean",
"description": "When true, exclude hits whose patent's current assignee of record is positively not the marketing institution (assigned-away or third-party owned); honest-unknowns are kept. Default false."
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}🟢get_technology(docket, as_of)
Fetch the published view of one technology by its TTO docket. Cited + confidence-stamped; point-in-time via 'as_of'. Patent data: Google Patents (CC BY 4.0) + USPTO (public domain). Summaries are IPNEX-authored. TTO listing content is linked, not reproduced.
Input Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"docket": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The TTO docket id, e.g. 'P160232US05', 'S17-467'."
},
"as_of": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ISO-8601 timestamp for the point-in-time published view."
}
},
"required": [
"docket"
],
"additionalProperties": false
}Community
Evidence