review-mcp

Multi-model code review: a panel of models + detectors return a pass/fail verdict. Paid via x402.

Should I use this

Quality & Safety

A
Description quality
100%
Schema completeness
100%
Naming quality
100%
Poisoning risk
100%
Permission match
100%
Protocol compliance
100%

Based on automated analysis of tool definitions and protocol compliance.

Context Cost

~469Tokens (tool definitions)
~2.1 KBTypical response size
Minimal attention impact (0.37% of 128k context)

This is the approximate number of tokens consumed each time the server's tools are loaded into a model's context. Higher counts reduce the attention available for other tasks.

Install

One-Click Install

Add this to your `claude_desktop_config.json` file:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "review-mcp": {
      "url": "https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Remote endpoints

https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcpstreamable-http

What it can do

Tool inventory

Tools (1)

🟢 Read-only🟡 Write🔴 Delete⚪ Unknown
🟡review_code(payload, language, context, depth)

Adversarial multi-model code review. Submit a diff, a module, or a spec+implementation and get back a structured pass/fail verdict with each issue's type, severity, location, explanation, and suggested fix. Why call this instead of reviewing your own output: a single model shares its blind spots with itself. This routes your code through a panel of *different* models plus a set of deterministic detectors, catching what self-review misses — path/contract violations, module incoherence (dangling imports, broken cross-references), syntax and call-arity regressions in a diff's post-image, and 'prose instead of tool calls' (output that describes an action rather than emitting it). The panel adds semantic judgment on top and never overrides a deterministic finding. Call it before shipping or merging, as a second opinion on a risky change, or as a gate in an autonomous build loop. Choose depth='fast' (one model, low latency) or 'deep' (full panel, higher recall). Deep review audits files of any size in milestone chunks so every panel model contributes; the price (shown in the 402) and the payment window scale with file size. Per-call limit ~1,600 lines — larger inputs return 413, so split by file/module and call once per file. Paid per call via x402 (USDC on Base); the price is announced in the 402 response before any charge.

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "payload": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "a unified diff, a complete module/file, or a spec plus its implementation (include enough context lines for diffs)."
    },
    "language": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "primary language of the payload (e.g. \"typescript\", \"python\")."
    },
    "context": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "optional spec/intent, related interfaces, constraints, or what the change should do."
    },
    "depth": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "fast",
        "deep"
      ],
      "description": "\"fast\" = single-model, low latency; \"deep\" = full panel, higher recall (default \"deep\")."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "payload",
    "language"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false,
  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
}

Community

Rate this Server

Evidence

Recent observations

verifiedversion not recorded1 tools
verifiedversion not recorded1 tools
verifiedversion not recorded1 tools