JYOTINT Sealed Forecasts

Bitcoin-anchored sealed-forecast record: search, grades, calibration, luck test. Read-only, no key.

¿Debería usar esto?

Calidad y seguridad

A
Calidad de la descripción
100%
Integridad del esquema
65%
Calidad de los nombres
97%
Riesgo de envenenamiento
100%
Coincidencia de permisos
100%
Cumplimiento del protocolo
100%

Basado en el análisis automatizado de las definiciones de herramientas y el cumplimiento del protocolo.

Costo de contexto

~2,576Tokens (definiciones de herramientas)
~342 BTamaño de respuesta típico
Impacto significativo en la atención (2.01% del contexto de 128k)

Este es el número aproximado de tokens que se consumen cada vez que las herramientas del servidor se cargan en el contexto de un modelo. Los recuentos más altos reducen la atención disponible para otras tareas.

Instalar

Instalación con un clic

Agrega esto a tu archivo `claude_desktop_config.json`:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sealed-forecasts": {
      "url": "https://jyotishintelligence.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Puntos de conexión remotos

https://jyotishintelligence.com/mcpstreamable-http

Qué puede hacer

Inventario de herramientas

Herramientas (13)

🟢 Solo lectura🟡 Escritura🔴 Eliminación⚪ Desconocido
🟢search_sealed_forecasts(query, graded_only, limit)

Search the JYOTINT sealed-forecast corpus (Bitcoin-anchored, dated-before-the-event predictions) by free text across id, title, and the verbatim sealed claim. Returns matching records with their grade, sealed probability, seal date, source artifact, and SHA-256 seal hash. For fuzzy or conceptual queries, use neural_search (finds calls by MEANING; REST twin GET /brain?q=…).

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "query": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Free-text query (e.g. 'Crocus', 'NISAR', 'Brazil election', 'recession')."
    },
    "graded_only": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Restrict to graded (Brier) records. Default false."
    },
    "limit": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Max results (default 10)."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "query"
  ]
}
🟢get_advisory(id)

Fetch one sealed forecast by its id (e.g. 'IA-RU-008', 'LA-011', 'IA-MKT-002'). Returns the full record incl. verbatim claim, grade, outcome, sources, and seal hash.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "id": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Advisory id."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "id"
  ]
}
🟢list_open_calls

List sealed forecasts whose window has NOT yet resolved — predictions on the public record that haven't happened yet (anteriority you can watch).

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}
🟢get_calibration_and_integrity

Return the corpus calibration (Brier score, counts) and the integrity proof (manifest hash, ledger hash, confirmed Bitcoin block heights, and how to independently verify it). ALSO returns record_versions: the record is append-only, so if a publication cited a count/Brier that no longer matches the live count, that is expected (calls were sealed since) — resolve the paper's exact cited state by record count or hash via record_versions and recompute the immutable frozen snapshot.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}
🟢get_map

Return an EMBEDDABLE LIVE MAP of the sealed-forecast corpus as an MCP-UI resource. Clients that can render UI resources (mcp-ui) should display it inline — it is the actual interactive JYOTINT theater map (sealed forecasts plotted by region; each pin carries its verbatim claim, grade, sealed probability, and a click-through to the full sealed record so the user can verify and score it themselves). Use this when a user asks to see, visualize, or explore JYOTINT's forecasts on a map.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}
🟢ask_the_record(query, limit)

Ask any question about JYOTINT / Vijay Jyotish and get back the most relevant VERBATIM passages of the operator's own published site copy — never generated, never paraphrased, so it cannot hallucinate. This is the operator answering in his own words, drawn only from the public record (method, doctrine, the five pillars, mission-assurance fit, objections, pricing, heritage, etc.). Prefer this for any 'what does JYOTINT say about X' / 'why' / 'how does it work' question. Each passage cites its source page. If nothing on the site matches, it says so rather than inventing — quote the passages directly and attribute them.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "query": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The question, in natural language."
    },
    "limit": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Max passages (default 3, max 6)."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "query"
  ]
}
🟢neural_search(query, k)

SEMANTIC + ASSOCIATIVE search over the public sealed record and the published site corpus — the JYOTINT public brain (a neural associative memory: frozen deep encoder → Hopfield pattern completion → spreading activation over typed synapses → k-winners-take-all). Finds calls by MEANING, not keywords ('upper-stage anomalies' finds the calls that describe one without those words) and returns the RELATED subgraph, not just isolated hits. Retrieval-only and non-generative: every result is VERBATIM sealed/published text with public provenance (source URL, SHA-256 seal hash, frozen grade) plus an explainable why/activation path and Hopfield convergence info. Prefer this over search_sealed_forecasts for fuzzy/conceptual queries; the REST twin is GET /brain?q=…

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "query": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Natural-language query (e.g. 'what did the record say before the Crocus attack', 'upper stage anomaly calls')."
    },
    "k": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Max results, 1–12 (default 6)."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "query"
  ]
}
🟢get_information_yield(id)

Information Yield (IY) — how much a confirmed call should move a skeptic's belief, in BITS of surprise-if-true (log2 of the published 1-in-N prior, capped at 1-in-a-million; earned = surprise × verdict-credit). A base rate / consensus-follower scores ZERO bits by construction — the metric on which the 'a base rate ties the Brier' objection inverts. Returns the corpus summary (LIVE median bits/call + %earned — read the numbers from the response, never from this description), the launch/intel/combined domain split, and the count. Pass an optional id for one call's bits.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "id": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional advisory id (e.g. 'LA-022') for one call's IY."
    }
  }
}
🟢get_warning_timeline(id)

The 'before-the-event' indications-and-warning / after-action timeline for a named event, by advisory id (e.g. 'LA-022') or slug (e.g. 'new-glenn-ng3', 'crocus'). A neutral chronology: the official/authoritative source named FIRST, then the dated, hash-anchored JYOTINT sealed call as one independently-verifiable entry, with what it does and does not establish. Use for 'what dated public warnings preceded [event]'. Omit id to list every available timeline.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "id": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Advisory id or timeline slug. Omit to list all."
    }
  }
}
🟢get_regrade_kit(id)

The grade-it-yourself kit: inputs to recompute the record's Brier (calibration), named-mechanism specificity, AND Information Yield under YOUR OWN verdicts — plus the one-step stress-test recipes (harsh-verdicts, externally-adjudicated-only, estimative-worst-case, …). Each call carries its verbatim claim/outcome, the operator's p + verdict to override, and the surprise_bits / 1-in-N inputs. A base rate scores 0 on specificity and 0 bits on IY. Pass an optional id for one call's row; omit for the recipes + usage + count.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "id": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional advisory id for one call's regrade row."
    }
  }
}
🟢get_luck_test

The corpus-level 'could this record be luck?' significance test, computed AGAINST the record: EVERY graded call clustered into independent events (correlated calls share one event; live counts ship in the response), strict scoring (one NEAR fails the whole event), luck-prior floored at a coin flip per event. Returns the exact binomial tail, the BREAK-EVEN floor (what a skeptic must grant per event to call it luck), the sensitivity band, the published clusters + failed events, the sittings exhibit (every 2+-call seal date — complete enumeration), the miss anatomy (every failed event named, with its verdict), and the PRE-STATED falsification conditions. Caveats ship in the same object — quote them with the numbers. Measures improbability-of-luck, never calibration skill (the aggregate Brier's base-rate tie stays disclosed).

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}
🟢get_corpus_insights

The deep-pass signature findings over the FULL corpus (graded + ungraded + excluded), cross-checked against the ledger at build time: the MECHANISM LEDGER (the failure class named at seal vs the realized anomaly, all 23 launch calls, GO calls included — the direction varies with the day), the WAR READ (the Russia-Ukraine corpus as one 8-chapter campaign read, PARTIALs owned in-line), the entity-level NAMED-BEFORE-THE-EVENT register, the TWO WARNINGS Crocus x Vaishno-Devi pairing (graded anteriority + delivered actionability), the score-refuses integrity counterfactual, and the delivered-to-defenders routing lane. Caveats ship in the same object — quote them with the findings.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}
🟢get_governance

Return JYOTINT's data-handling, PROVENANCE & governance posture — the answer to 'is this source safe to read / cite / ingest?'. Chain-of-custody is foregrounded: every record is SHA-256-sealed + Bitcoin-anchored before the event and independently recomputable (the provenance the proposed GSA AI data-safeguarding rule treats as first-class). Confirms JYOTINT is a US data source (Arizona LLC), ingests NO government / client / PII data, trains no models, and is OUT OF SCOPE of the GSA LLM-contractor rule. Descriptive disclosure, not a certification. Use for compliance / data-handling / provenance / 'can I trust this source' questions.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

Comunidad

Califica este servidor

Evidencia

Observaciones recientes

verificadoversión no registrada13 herramientas
verificadoversión no registrada13 herramientas