DeepPVMapper

Open registry of 1.14M+ rooftop-solar detections across France, queryable by natural language.

¿Debería usar esto?

Calidad y seguridad

A
Calidad de la descripción
100%
Integridad del esquema
85%
Calidad de los nombres
100%
Riesgo de envenenamiento
100%
Coincidencia de permisos
100%
Cumplimiento del protocolo
100%

Basado en el análisis automatizado de las definiciones de herramientas y el cumplimiento del protocolo.

Costo de contexto

~2,457Tokens (definiciones de herramientas)
~2.1 KBTamaño de respuesta típico
Impacto moderado en la atención (1.92% del contexto de 128k)

Este es el número aproximado de tokens que se consumen cada vez que las herramientas del servidor se cargan en el contexto de un modelo. Los recuentos más altos reducen la atención disponible para otras tareas.

Instalar

Instalación con un clic

Agrega esto a tu archivo `claude_desktop_config.json`:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "deeppvmapper": {
      "url": "https://zelhliylrlktnasircwp.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Puntos de conexión remotos

https://zelhliylrlktnasircwp.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp/mcpstreamable-http

Qué puede hacer

Inventario de herramientas

Herramientas (8)

🟢 Solo lectura🟡 Escritura🔴 Eliminación⚪ Desconocido
🟢get_data_quality_reference

Return the DeepPVMapper/OpenPVMapper registry's documented data-quality characteristics: estimated detection recall, which fields are model-derived estimates vs. structural/observed fields, the source-encoding table, the recommended confidence threshold, confidence signals, and licensing/liability terms. Call this before advising how much to trust a result for a specific use case (e.g. exploratory research vs. a commercial or regulatory decision) — pair it with the quality_summary attached to search_detections / aggregate_detection_capacity results, which reflects the specific query rather than the registry as a whole.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_department_capacity_stats(dpt, top_n)

Get installed rooftop-PV capacity (total kWp) and system counts for one or all French départements, from the DeepPVMapper/OpenPVMapper registry. This is a fixed, pre-computed department-wide aggregate with no other filters — use aggregate_detection_capacity instead if you need a filtered subset (e.g. only cross-validated detections). Data quality note: this is a detection dataset, not an exhaustive inventory (estimated recall ~0.6). A missing detection does not mean no PV installation exists there. kwp, surface, tilt and azimuth are model estimates, not surveyed values. Call get_data_quality_reference for the full picture before assessing fitness for a specific use case.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "dpt": {
      "description": "French département code, e.g. \"33\" for Gironde. Omit for all départements.",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "top_n": {
      "description": "If set and dpt is omitted, return only the top N départements by installed capacity.",
      "type": "integer",
      "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      "maximum": 96
    }
  },
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_department_yearly_stats(dpt)

Get yearly system counts and capacity by département, based on first-seen imagery year. Useful for tracking apparent PV deployment growth over time. Data quality note: this is a detection dataset, not an exhaustive inventory (estimated recall ~0.6). A missing detection does not mean no PV installation exists there. kwp, surface, tilt and azimuth are model estimates, not surveyed values. Call get_data_quality_reference for the full picture before assessing fitness for a specific use case.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "dpt": {
      "description": "French département code, e.g. \"33\". Omit for all départements.",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢search_detections(dpt, insee, min_kwp, max_kwp, min_vintages, ...)

Search individual rooftop-PV detections by département, commune (INSEE code), estimated capacity range, and/or cross-validation confidence (min_vintages, cross_validated). Returns a bounded list of detection records plus a quality_summary for the returned sample (use get_detections_in_bbox instead for map/spatial queries with geometry). Data quality note: this is a detection dataset, not an exhaustive inventory (estimated recall ~0.6). A missing detection does not mean no PV installation exists there. kwp, surface, tilt and azimuth are model estimates, not surveyed values. Call get_data_quality_reference for the full picture before assessing fitness for a specific use case.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "dpt": {
      "description": "French département code, e.g. \"33\".",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "insee": {
      "description": "INSEE commune code.",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "min_kwp": {
      "description": "Minimum estimated installed capacity, in kWp.",
      "type": "number"
    },
    "max_kwp": {
      "description": "Maximum estimated installed capacity, in kWp.",
      "type": "number"
    },
    "min_vintages": {
      "description": "Minimum number of distinct imagery vintages (years) the installation was independently detected in. Use 2+ as a persistence/confidence signal, since a one-off detection in a single vintage is more likely to be a transient artifact.",
      "type": "integer",
      "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      "maximum": 9007199254740991
    },
    "cross_validated": {
      "description": "If true, only include detections confirmed by at least two independent sources (e.g. the automated DeepPVMapper pipeline plus OpenStreetMap or the FRPV reference dataset), not just a single pipeline. This is a stronger confidence signal than min_vintages.",
      "type": "boolean"
    },
    "quality_filter": {
      "default": true,
      "description": "If true (default), only include detections with frpv_proba >= 0.1, the threshold recommended in the data contract for a good precision/recall trade-off.",
      "type": "boolean"
    },
    "limit": {
      "default": 20,
      "description": "Maximum number of records to return (max 200).",
      "type": "integer",
      "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      "maximum": 200
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "quality_filter",
    "limit"
  ],
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟡aggregate_detection_capacity(dpt, insee, min_kwp, max_kwp, min_vintages, ...)

Compute the total estimated installed capacity (kWp) and count of detections matching a set of filters — département, commune, capacity range, and cross-validation across sources (cross_validated) or imagery vintages (min_vintages) — plus a quality_summary for the summed sample. Unlike get_department_capacity_stats, which is a fixed pre-computed département-wide aggregate with no other filters, this tool sums a live filtered subset, up to max_rows detections. Example: "installed capacity in Gironde confirmed by at least two sources" -> dpt="33", cross_validated=true. Data quality note: this is a detection dataset, not an exhaustive inventory (estimated recall ~0.6). A missing detection does not mean no PV installation exists there. kwp, surface, tilt and azimuth are model estimates, not surveyed values. Call get_data_quality_reference for the full picture before assessing fitness for a specific use case.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "dpt": {
      "description": "French département code, e.g. \"33\".",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "insee": {
      "description": "INSEE commune code.",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "min_kwp": {
      "description": "Minimum estimated installed capacity, in kWp.",
      "type": "number"
    },
    "max_kwp": {
      "description": "Maximum estimated installed capacity, in kWp.",
      "type": "number"
    },
    "min_vintages": {
      "description": "Minimum number of distinct imagery vintages (years) the installation was independently detected in. Use 2+ as a persistence/confidence signal, since a one-off detection in a single vintage is more likely to be a transient artifact.",
      "type": "integer",
      "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      "maximum": 9007199254740991
    },
    "cross_validated": {
      "description": "If true, only include detections confirmed by at least two independent sources (e.g. the automated DeepPVMapper pipeline plus OpenStreetMap or the FRPV reference dataset), not just a single pipeline. This is a stronger confidence signal than min_vintages.",
      "type": "boolean"
    },
    "quality_filter": {
      "default": true,
      "description": "If true (default), only include detections with frpv_proba >= 0.1, the threshold recommended in the data contract for a good precision/recall trade-off.",
      "type": "boolean"
    },
    "max_rows": {
      "default": 5000,
      "description": "Cap on the number of matching detection rows fetched to compute the capacity sum. If the true match count exceeds this, total_kwp is a partial lower bound and `truncated` is true — increase max_rows or narrow the filters (e.g. add dpt or insee) for an exact total.",
      "type": "integer",
      "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      "maximum": 20000
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "quality_filter",
    "max_rows"
  ],
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_detections_in_bbox(min_lon, min_lat, max_lon, max_lat, max_count)

Get rooftop-PV detections within a geographic bounding box (WGS84 lon/lat), including footprint geometry. Intended for map-style spatial queries over a small area. Data quality note: this is a detection dataset, not an exhaustive inventory (estimated recall ~0.6). A missing detection does not mean no PV installation exists there. kwp, surface, tilt and azimuth are model estimates, not surveyed values. Call get_data_quality_reference for the full picture before assessing fitness for a specific use case.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "min_lon": {
      "type": "number"
    },
    "min_lat": {
      "type": "number"
    },
    "max_lon": {
      "type": "number"
    },
    "max_lat": {
      "type": "number"
    },
    "max_count": {
      "default": 100,
      "description": "Maximum number of detections to return (max 500 here; the underlying API defaults to 2000, capped lower to keep responses manageable for an LLM).",
      "type": "integer",
      "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      "maximum": 500
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "min_lon",
    "min_lat",
    "max_lon",
    "max_lat",
    "max_count"
  ],
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟡get_community_activity(recent_limit)

Get a snapshot of ongoing community contribution activity on the map: how many corrections are currently pending moderation, their breakdown by action type (add / modify / delete), and the most recent submissions (timestamp, action, target). Submitted free-text comments are intentionally excluded from this tool. This reflects unmoderated, unverified user activity, not the registry itself — do not present it as confirmed detection data.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "recent_limit": {
      "default": 15,
      "description": "How many of the most recent pending contributions to list.",
      "type": "integer",
      "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      "maximum": 50
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "recent_limit"
  ],
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_community_activity_in_area(dpt, min_lon, min_lat, max_lon, max_lat, ...)

Find pending, unmoderated community contributions relevant to a specific area, to answer "has anyone flagged anything here that is not in the registry yet?" Two independent filters: dpt finds pending edits/deletions (action=modify/delete) targeting existing detections in that département; a full bounding box (min_lon/min_lat/max_lon/max_lat) finds pending new additions (action=add) whose proposed footprint centroid falls inside it. Combine with get_department_capacity_stats / search_detections / get_detections_in_bbox for the confirmed registry picture, and present this separately and clearly as unverified, pending community input — not confirmed detection data. Free-text comments are never included.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "dpt": {
      "description": "Filter pending edits/deletions of EXISTING detections (action=modify or delete) to this département. Does not apply to proposed new additions (action=add), which have no département recorded on the pending item itself — use the bbox parameters for those.",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "min_lon": {
      "type": "number"
    },
    "min_lat": {
      "type": "number"
    },
    "max_lon": {
      "type": "number"
    },
    "max_lat": {
      "type": "number"
    },
    "scan_limit": {
      "default": 500,
      "description": "How many recent proposed additions (action=add) to scan for a bbox match. Only relevant when all four bbox parameters are given — there is no server-side spatial index on pending items, so matching is done by fetching this many of the most recent ones and checking their centroid against the box.",
      "type": "integer",
      "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      "maximum": 2000
    },
    "recent_limit": {
      "default": 30,
      "description": "Maximum number of matching items to return per category.",
      "type": "integer",
      "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      "maximum": 100
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "scan_limit",
    "recent_limit"
  ],
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "additionalProperties": false
}

Comunidad

Califica este servidor

Evidencia

Observaciones recientes

verificadoversión no registrada8 herramientas