verantis-mcp

Verified directory for machine payments (x402 & MPP): check services and wallets before agents pay.

¿Debería usar esto?

Calidad y seguridad

A
Calidad de la descripción
93%
Integridad del esquema
83%
Calidad de los nombres
95%
Riesgo de envenenamiento
100%
Coincidencia de permisos
100%
Cumplimiento del protocolo
100%

Hallazgos (1)

  • LOWTool 'directory_stats' description lacks action verben directory_stats

Basado en el análisis automatizado de las definiciones de herramientas y el cumplimiento del protocolo.

Costo de contexto

~1,009Tokens (definiciones de herramientas)
~1.4 KBTamaño de respuesta típico
Impacto moderado en la atención (0.79% del contexto de 128k)

Este es el número aproximado de tokens que se consumen cada vez que las herramientas del servidor se cargan en el contexto de un modelo. Los recuentos más altos reducen la atención disponible para otras tareas.

Instalar

Instalación con un clic

Agrega esto a tu archivo `claude_desktop_config.json`:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "verantis-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "verantis-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Paquetes ejecutables

pypiverantis-mcp0.2.1stdio

Puntos de conexión remotos

https://api.verantis.ai/mcpstreamable-http

Qué puede hacer

Inventario de herramientas

Herramientas (4)

🟢 Solo lectura🟡 Escritura🔴 Eliminación⚪ Desconocido
🟢find_paid_service(query, verified_only, max_price_usd, chain, protocol, ...)

Search Verantis's verified directory of machine-payable services (x402, MPP). Results are UNIFIED per service (host): each carries its settlement rails ('rails': base / solana / tempo), and every rail has its OWN reputation, price, and buyer retention — never blended. Pass 'chain' and 'matched_rail' marks that chain's rail so you see the reputation for the rail you'll actually pay on. 'coming_soon' lists advertised chains not yet measured. Each rail's 'wallet_scope' says if its pay-to wallet is 'dedicated' (the buyers/payments/volume are this service's own) or 'shared' (a relay/treasury fronting 'wallet_services' services, so those figures are the pool's inbound, not this service alone). Prefer verified=true before paying anyone.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "query": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "what you need, e.g. 'twitter data', 'web search', 'rpc ethereum'"
    },
    "verified_only": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "default": true,
      "description": "only services that passed the latest live probe"
    },
    "max_price_usd": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "max price per call in USD"
    },
    "chain": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "settlement network, e.g. base, solana, polygon, tempo"
    },
    "protocol": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "x402",
        "mpp"
      ],
      "description": "restrict to one payment protocol: x402 or mpp"
    },
    "limit": {
      "type": "integer",
      "default": 10,
      "description": "maximum number of results to return (default 10)"
    },
    "min_score": {
      "type": "integer",
      "description": "minimum trust score 0-100 — set high (e.g. 85) for money-moving tasks"
    },
    "max_latency_ms": {
      "type": "integer",
      "description": "reject services slower than this (ms)"
    },
    "exclude_concentrated": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "default": false,
      "description": "exclude services from operators with many listings under one registrable owner (a neutral concentration signal, not a fraud claim)"
    },
    "proven_only": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "default": false,
      "description": "only services that have EARNED reputation over time (excludes 'new' services and 'watch' services whose on-chain payments are concentrated / not yet broadly distributed). Reputation is earned via consistent history + on-chain buyer retention; a brand-new well-behaved service is verified but new, not top-trust."
    },
    "require_fresh": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "default": false,
      "description": "live re-probe stale results before returning — use before paying real money; adds ~1s per stale service"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "query"
  ]
}
🟢get_service(domain)

Full unified record for one service host: every settlement rail it accepts on, each with its own reputation, price, buyers, volume and history, plus coming-soon chains. Each rail's 'wallet_scope' marks a 'shared' pay-to wallet (buyers/volume are pooled inbound across 'wallet_services' services, not this one alone) vs 'dedicated' (this service's own). Pass the host (domain).

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "domain": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "the service host / domain to look up, e.g. api.nansen.ai"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "domain"
  ]
}
🟢directory_stats

Index-level statistics: services, verification breakdown, data freshness.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}
🟢check_wallet(pay_to)

Check a recipient wallet BEFORE your agent pays it — a pre-payment guard. Pass the pay-to address a service asked you to pay; returns whether Verantis knows the wallet, its EARNED reputation tier, and human-readable reasons. A wallet IS a settlement rail, so the reply names the rail it settles on ('rail': chain + protocols), its host, on-chain buyer retention (distinct buyers, repeat rate, distribution), and the host's OTHER rails ('also_settles_on'). If 'shared_wallet' is true the address fronts many services (a relay/treasury) so the reputation reflects the pool, not one service — treat with care. An unknown or low-reputation recipient is a reason to pause.

Esquema de entrada

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "pay_to": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "recipient wallet address (0x… for Base/EVM, base58 for Solana)"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "pay_to"
  ]
}

Comunidad

Califica este servidor

Evidencia

Observaciones recientes

verificadoversión no registrada4 herramientas
verificadoversión no registrada4 herramientas