Antevo Trademark

Is that brand name taken? Screen the registers and check the opposition window. No account.

使うべきか

品質と安全性

A
説明の品質
100%
スキーマの完全性
80%
命名の品質
80%
ポイズニングのリスク
100%
権限の一致
100%
プロトコルへの準拠
100%

ツール定義とプロトコルへの準拠に関する自動分析に基づいています。

コンテキストコスト

~744トークン数(ツール定義)
~397 B一般的なレスポンスサイズ
注意への影響は中程度(128k コンテキストの 0.58%)

これは、サーバーのツールがモデルのコンテキストに読み込まれるたびに消費されるおおよそのトークン数です。数が多いほど、ほかのタスクに使える注意が減ります。

インストール

ワンクリックインストール

これを `claude_desktop_config.json` ファイルに追加してください:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "trademark": {
      "url": "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp"
    }
  }
}

リモートエンドポイント

https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcpstreamable-http

できること

ツール一覧

ツール(4)

🟢 読み取り専用🟡 書き込み🔴 削除⚪ 不明
🟢screen_mark(mark)

Screen a brand name against the live trademark registers. Free, no account. Returns every mark near it with a similarity tier, plus which registers were checked. This is the first thing to run when someone asks 'is my name taken'.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "mark": {
      "title": "Mark",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "mark"
  ],
  "title": "screen_markArguments"
}
🟢suggest_classes(description)

Which Nice classes a business like this files in. Free, no account, no database. The question people cannot answer for themselves: not "is my name taken" but "taken in WHAT". Nice has 45 classes and the numbering is opaque — software you download is class 9, software you log into is class 42, and selling other people's goods is class 35 whatever the goods are. Filing in one and not the other is the most expensive routine mistake in the process. Run this BEFORE screen_mark when someone describes a business rather than naming a class: the classes it returns are what makes a screen mean anything. Relay the reasoning, not just the numbers, and keep the closing caveat — this reports how similar businesses file, and their counsel decides what they actually file.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "description": {
      "title": "Description",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "description"
  ],
  "title": "suggest_classesArguments"
}
🟢holder_read(name)

Who a holder is and how they file — the read on an adversary. Free. Computed from their whole register book: how much of it they let lapse, whether their marks cluster where they trade or spray across unrelated classes, and the leverage that gives counsel. Present the evidence, not just the label — and never call anyone a squatter; that is a legal conclusion we do not assert.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "name": {
      "title": "Name",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "name"
  ],
  "title": "holder_readArguments"
}
🟢opposition_window(office)

How long you have to oppose a filing in a given trademark office, and from when. Twenty registers, each with the provision the window comes from. The trap this answers: most offices run opposition BEFORE registration, from publication of the application, but a minority — Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Sweden — register the mark first and run the window from publication of the REGISTRATION. Applying one office's rule to another invents a deadline that never existed. Accepts a country name, an office name or a two-letter code ('japan', 'JP', 'EU').

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "office": {
      "title": "Office",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "office"
  ],
  "title": "opposition_windowArguments"
}

推奨プロンプト

retrieve_data
Get details about [item] from Antevo Trademark
想定されるツール: holder_read
fetch_info
Fetch [information type] using Antevo Trademark
想定されるツール: holder_read

コミュニティ

このサーバーを評価する

エビデンス

最近の観測

検証済みバージョンは記録されていませんツール 4 件
検証済みバージョンは記録されていませんツール 4 件