Digital Gemology: gemstone and diamond cut library

Gemstone and diamond cuts: ray-traced brilliance, fire and sparkle in 7 gems, 3D and faceting files

使うべきか

品質と安全性

A
説明の品質
95%
スキーマの完全性
89%
命名の品質
93%
ポイズニングのリスク
100%
権限の一致
100%
プロトコルへの準拠
100%

ツール定義とプロトコルへの準拠に関する自動分析に基づいています。

コンテキストコスト

~2,012トークン数(ツール定義)
~1.6 KB一般的なレスポンスサイズ
注意への影響は中程度(128k コンテキストの 1.57%)

これは、サーバーのツールがモデルのコンテキストに読み込まれるたびに消費されるおおよそのトークン数です。数が多いほど、ほかのタスクに使える注意が減ります。

インストール

ワンクリックインストール

これを `claude_desktop_config.json` ファイルに追加してください:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cut-library": {
      "url": "https://digitalgemology.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

リモートエンドポイント

https://digitalgemology.com/mcpstreamable-http

できること

ツール一覧

ツール(8)

🟢 読み取り専用🟡 書き込み🔴 削除⚪ 不明
🟢search_cuts(query, category, shape, gemstone, sort, ...)

Search Digital Gemology's gem cuts and Platonic solids by name, style, shape or use (for example 'square step cut', 'round brilliant for moissanite', 'historic cushion', 'pear'). Returns each match with its page, facets, size, price and checkout links. Give a gemstone to add the cut's brilliance, fire and scintillation in that stone and to sort by them.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "query": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Free text. Leave it out to list every cut that fits the filters."
    },
    "category": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "brilliants",
        "jewelry",
        "historic",
        "house",
        "platonic"
      ],
      "description": "brilliants, jewelry (fancy and step cuts), historic, house (our own designs) or platonic (solids, 3D files only)."
    },
    "shape": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "round",
        "elongated",
        "square",
        "triangular",
        "other",
        "solid"
      ],
      "description": "Outline of the cut."
    },
    "gemstone": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "diamond",
        "moissanite",
        "cubic-zirconia",
        "ruby",
        "sapphire",
        "emerald",
        "amethyst"
      ],
      "description": "Gemstone, as its slug."
    },
    "sort": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "relevance",
        "total",
        "brilliance",
        "fire",
        "scintillation",
        "facets",
        "name"
      ],
      "description": "relevance (default with a query), total (brilliance + fire + scintillation, the default with a gemstone and no query), brilliance, fire, scintillation, facets (most first) or name."
    },
    "cutting_files": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Only cuts that are also sold as GemCad cutting files."
    },
    "limit": {
      "type": "integer",
      "minimum": 1,
      "maximum": 50,
      "default": 10,
      "description": "How many cuts to return, 1 to 50; 10 if left out."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_cut(cut, gemstone)

Everything about one cut: what it is, measured specifications (facets, angles, depth, size, index gear), brilliance, fire and scintillation in all seven gemstones against the T73, the products with prices and checkout links, its questions and answers, and its page.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "cut": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The cut's slug or name, for example 'asscher', 'T73' or 'Old European'."
    },
    "gemstone": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "diamond",
        "moissanite",
        "cubic-zirconia",
        "ruby",
        "sapphire",
        "emerald",
        "amethyst"
      ],
      "description": "Optional: also return the pros and cons of this cut in this stone."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "cut"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢best_cuts_for_gemstone(gemstone, kind)

The top ten brilliants and the top ten jewelry cuts in one gemstone, ranked by brilliance, fire and scintillation added together, with the stone's optical constants.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "gemstone": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "diamond",
        "moissanite",
        "cubic-zirconia",
        "ruby",
        "sapphire",
        "emerald",
        "amethyst"
      ],
      "description": "Gemstone, as its slug."
    },
    "kind": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "brilliants",
        "jewelry",
        "both"
      ],
      "default": "both",
      "description": "brilliants (round cuts), jewelry (fancy and step shapes) or both."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "gemstone"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢cut_in_gemstone(cut, gemstone)

How one cut performs in one gemstone: its headline, eight measured scores against the T73 round brilliant in the same stone, and its pros and cons. For questions like 'is an oval a good cut for sapphire?'.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "cut": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The cut's slug or name."
    },
    "gemstone": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "diamond",
        "moissanite",
        "cubic-zirconia",
        "ruby",
        "sapphire",
        "emerald",
        "amethyst"
      ],
      "description": "Gemstone, as its slug."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "cut",
    "gemstone"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢list_gemstones

The seven gemstones every cut is measured in, with refractive index, critical angle, dispersion, hardness and specific gravity, and the three best cuts of each kind.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢get_cut_scores(cut, category, material)

Scores from the Digital Gemology Cut Performance Index for every cut we sell: overall, brilliance, fire, scintillation, tilt, symmetry, spread, shape-norm and leakage, ray traced separately in diamond, moissanite, cubic zirconia, ruby, sapphire, emerald and amethyst, with each cut's place in its material. Filter by cut, category or material; with no filter, every row. Figures are unrounded. Never compare or rank scores across materials. Ruby and sapphire share one refractive index, so the same figures. Cuts not yet scored come with the reason.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "cut": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The cut's slug or name, for example 'oval' or 'DG-M5'."
    },
    "category": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "brilliants",
        "jewelry",
        "historic",
        "house",
        "platonic"
      ],
      "description": "brilliants, jewelry, historic, house or platonic."
    },
    "material": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "diamond",
        "moissanite",
        "cubic-zirconia",
        "ruby",
        "sapphire",
        "emerald",
        "amethyst"
      ],
      "description": "One stone (diamond, moissanite, cubic-zirconia, ruby, sapphire, emerald or amethyst); leave it out for all seven."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢compare_cuts(cut_a, cut_b, gemstone)

Two cuts side by side in one gemstone: overall, brilliance, fire, scintillation, tilt, face-up spread and leakage from the Cut Performance Index, each cut's place in that stone, facets and size, and the products with prices and checkout links. For questions like 'oval or pear for my sapphire?'.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "cut_a": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The first cut's slug or name, for example 'oval'."
    },
    "cut_b": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The second cut's slug or name, for example 'pear'."
    },
    "gemstone": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "diamond",
        "moissanite",
        "cubic-zirconia",
        "ruby",
        "sapphire",
        "emerald",
        "amethyst"
      ],
      "description": "The stone to compare them in; diamond if left out."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "cut_a",
    "cut_b"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}
🟢recommend_cut(gemstone, priority, category, shape, limit)

The best cuts in one gemstone for what matters to the buyer: overall light performance, brilliance, fire, scintillation (sparkle), spread (looks bigger for its weight), tilt (stays bright when tilted) or leakage (least light lost). Filter by family or outline. Returns a ranked short list with each cut's page and checkout links.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "gemstone": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "diamond",
        "moissanite",
        "cubic-zirconia",
        "ruby",
        "sapphire",
        "emerald",
        "amethyst"
      ],
      "description": "Gemstone, as its slug."
    },
    "priority": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "overall",
        "brilliance",
        "fire",
        "scintillation",
        "spread",
        "tilt",
        "leakage"
      ],
      "default": "overall",
      "description": "What to rank by; leakage ranks the least light lost first. overall if left out."
    },
    "category": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "brilliants",
        "jewelry",
        "historic",
        "house"
      ],
      "description": "Only this family: brilliants, jewelry, historic or house. All if left out."
    },
    "shape": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "round",
        "elongated",
        "square",
        "triangular",
        "other"
      ],
      "description": "Only cuts with this outline. All if left out."
    },
    "limit": {
      "type": "integer",
      "minimum": 1,
      "maximum": 20,
      "default": 5,
      "description": "How many cuts to return, 1 to 20; 5 if left out."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "gemstone"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

コミュニティ

このサーバーを評価する

エビデンス

最近の観測

検証済みバージョンは記録されていませんツール 8 件