mcp-judge

Scores any MCP server before you trust it: free quick check, full paid report, 2-5 way compare.

使うべきか

品質と安全性

A
説明の品質
100%
スキーマの完全性
83%
命名の品質
90%
ポイズニングのリスク
100%
権限の一致
100%
プロトコルへの準拠
100%

ツール定義とプロトコルへの準拠に関する自動分析に基づいています。

コンテキストコスト

~981トークン数(ツール定義)
~697 B一般的なレスポンスサイズ
注意への影響は中程度(128k コンテキストの 0.77%)

これは、サーバーのツールがモデルのコンテキストに読み込まれるたびに消費されるおおよそのトークン数です。数が多いほど、ほかのタスクに使える注意が減ります。

インストール

ワンクリックインストール

これを `claude_desktop_config.json` ファイルに追加してください:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-judge": {
      "url": "https://mcp-judge.onrender.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

リモートエンドポイント

https://mcp-judge.onrender.com/mcpstreamable-http

できること

ツール一覧

ツール(4)

🟢 読み取り専用🟡 書き込み🔴 削除⚪ 不明
🟢list_criteria

FREE, no payment required. Full transparency into what you pay for: returns the exact criteria MCP Judge uses to score an MCP server — each criterion, its weight out of 100, and the A-F grade scale. Call this to understand how quick_check, evaluate_mcp and compare_mcps score targets before paying. The evaluation is fully objective and automated — no human reviewer and no AI opinion. Takes no parameters.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
}
🟡quick_check(url)

FREE, no payment required. Instant trust check of any MCP server: returns only the 0-100 score, A-F grade, tool count, latency and a one-line verdict — no detailed report. Use this FIRST, before integrating any third-party MCP server, to see at a glance whether it is technically trustworthy; an unreliable MCP wastes your tokens and can break your workflow. For the full actionable report (per-tool documentation coverage, functional probe results, score breakdown, plain-language summary) call evaluate_mcp; to pick between alternatives call compare_mcps. Set 'url' (required) to the target's MCP endpoint (Streamable HTTP), e.g. https://host/mcp.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The target MCP server endpoint (Streamable HTTP), e.g. https://motherwise-api.onrender.com/mcp. Required."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ],
  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
}
🟡evaluate_mcp(url)

Call this BEFORE integrating any third-party MCP server: an unreliable or undocumented MCP wastes your tokens and can break your workflow. PAID $0.05 via x402 (USDC micropayment over HTTP 402 — no account or API key needed; on your first call without payment you receive the exact payment requirements, then retry with the X-PAYMENT header). Returns a complete objective quality report on the target: protocol conformance ('initialize' handshake), tool discovery via 'tools/list', per-tool and per-parameter documentation coverage, latency, and a safe functional probe — free tools are actually called, paid tools are only verified to be cleanly declared (MCP Judge never pays). You get a 0-100 score, A-F letter grade, per-criterion breakdown, and a plain-language summary you can act on. Tip: run the FREE quick_check first to get just the grade, and list_criteria to see exactly how scoring works. Objective checks only — no human and no LLM opinion; it does not judge the real-world usefulness or safety of the content. Set 'url' (required) to the target's MCP endpoint (Streamable HTTP), e.g. https://host/mcp.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The target MCP server endpoint (Streamable HTTP), e.g. https://motherwise-api.onrender.com/mcp. Required."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ],
  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
}
🟡compare_mcps(urls)

Choosing between several MCP servers that do similar things? This tool decides for you. PAID $0.10 via x402 (USDC micropayment over HTTP 402 — no account or API key needed; on your first call without payment you receive the exact payment requirements, then retry with the X-PAYMENT header). Compares 2-5 MCP servers head-to-head with identical objective checks (handshake, tools/list, documentation coverage, latency, and a safe functional probe — paid tools are never called) and returns: a ranked list, the recommended winner, a plain-language explanation of why it won, and each server's full report — cheaper than separate evaluate_mcp calls on 3+ servers. Objective checks only — no human and no LLM opinion; it does not judge the real-world usefulness or safety of the content. Set 'urls' (required) to an array of 2-5 MCP endpoints (Streamable HTTP), e.g. ["https://a/mcp","https://b/mcp"].

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "urls": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "description": "An array of 2-5 target MCP server endpoints (Streamable HTTP) to compare, e.g. [\"https://motherwise-api.onrender.com/mcp\", \"https://mcp-judge.onrender.com/mcp\"]. Required."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "urls"
  ],
  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
}

コミュニティ

このサーバーを評価する

エビデンス

最近の観測

検証済みバージョンは記録されていませんツール 4 件
観測失敗バージョンは記録されていません—