NVIDIA NemoClaw CKG

NVIDIA NemoClaw knowledge graph — 55 nodes, F1 0.576 (+269% vs RAG), 11x fewer tokens. MCP-native.

使うべきか

品質と安全性

A
説明の品質
95%
スキーマの完全性
74%
命名の品質
95%
ポイズニングのリスク
100%
権限の一致
100%
プロトコルへの準拠
100%

ツール定義とプロトコルへの準拠に関する自動分析に基づいています。

コンテキストコスト

~1,651トークン数(ツール定義)
~879 B一般的なレスポンスサイズ
注意への影響は中程度(128k コンテキストの 1.29%)

これは、サーバーのツールがモデルのコンテキストに読み込まれるたびに消費されるおおよそのトークン数です。数が多いほど、ほかのタスクに使える注意が減ります。

インストール

ワンクリックインストール

これを `claude_desktop_config.json` ファイルに追加してください:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ckg-nvidia-nemoclaw": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "ckg-nvidia-nemoclaw"
      ]
    }
  }
}

実行可能なパッケージ

pypickg-nvidia-nemoclaw0.10.3stdio

リモートエンドポイント

https://ckg-nvidia-nemoclaw.onrender.com/mcpstreamable-http

できること

ツール一覧

ツール(8)

🟢 読み取り専用🟡 書き込み🔴 削除⚪ 不明
⚪ask_nemoclaw(question)

Answer a question about NVIDIA NemoClaw by traversing the knowledge graph. Covers: agent runtimes (OpenClaw/Hermes/Deep Agents), OpenShell platform, inference routing, network policy, security layers, deployment paths, progressive tool disclosure, managed MCP servers, snapshots, shields, FOX Blueprint, Nemotron 3 Ultra ecosystem, and platform support. Args: question: Your question about NemoClaw concepts or architecture.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "question": {
      "title": "Question",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "question"
  ],
  "title": "ask_nemoclawArguments"
}

出力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "result": {
      "title": "Result",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "result"
  ],
  "title": "ask_nemoclawOutput"
}
🟢query_ckg(concept, depth)

Return the typed subgraph around a NemoClaw concept. Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label (e.g. 'OpenClaw', 'NetworkPolicy', 'L7Proxy'). depth: Traversal hops (1–5, default 3).

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "concept": {
      "title": "Concept",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "depth": {
      "default": 3,
      "title": "Depth",
      "type": "integer"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "concept"
  ],
  "title": "query_ckgArguments"
}

出力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "result": {
      "title": "Result",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "result"
  ],
  "title": "query_ckgOutput"
}
🟢get_prerequisites(concept)

Return the full upstream prerequisite chain for a NemoClaw concept. Useful for understanding what a concept depends on end-to-end. Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "concept": {
      "title": "Concept",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "concept"
  ],
  "title": "get_prerequisitesArguments"
}

出力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "result": {
      "title": "Result",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "result"
  ],
  "title": "get_prerequisitesOutput"
}
🟢search_concepts(query)

Fuzzy search for NemoClaw concepts by name or keyword. Args: query: Partial name or keyword (e.g. 'policy', 'inference', 'agent').

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "query": {
      "title": "Query",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "query"
  ],
  "title": "search_conceptsArguments"
}

出力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "result": {
      "title": "Result",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "result"
  ],
  "title": "search_conceptsOutput"
}
🟢list_domains

List available domains in this CKG server.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "title": "list_domainsArguments"
}

出力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "result": {
      "title": "Result",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "result"
  ],
  "title": "list_domainsOutput"
}
🟡verify_source(concept)

Return the authoritative source URL and content hash for a NemoClaw concept node. Every node in the CKG was declared from a specific source document. This tool returns the source URL (where the node came from) and the SHA-256 hash of that document's bytes at extraction time. A hash mismatch on re-fetch means either the source has changed (stale edge — re-extract) or the graph was patched without re-fetching (silent edit — investigate). Audit chain: edge answer → graph commit → source_hash → source_url (fetch hint) Verification: curl -s <source_url> | sha256sum # compare output to source_hash Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label (e.g. 'CorporateCA', 'L7Proxy').

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "concept": {
      "title": "Concept",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "concept"
  ],
  "title": "verify_sourceArguments"
}

出力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "result": {
      "title": "Result",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "result"
  ],
  "title": "verify_sourceOutput"
}
🟢route_query(question)

Route a NemoClaw question to the optimal model and reasoning approach via graph depth. The CKG graph IS the router. NemoClaw's dependency chains (e.g. OpenShell → L7Proxy → CorporateCA → mTLS) are deep and typed — hop depth is a deterministic complexity signal. No heuristic: the graph decides which model and reasoning approach to use. Routing table: hop_depth 1 → haiku · direct (single concept lookup) hop_depth 2 → sonnet · generic_cot (moderate chain) hop_depth 3+ → opus · sparql_cot (deep chain, structured reasoning required) Args: question: Concept name or natural language question about NemoClaw / OpenShell. Returns: model_tier + reasoning_approach + why + context subgraph to inject before LLM call.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "question": {
      "title": "Question",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "question"
  ],
  "title": "route_queryArguments"
}

出力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "result": {
      "title": "Result",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "result"
  ],
  "title": "route_queryOutput"
}
🟡query_intersect(branches, depth, direction, mode, limit)

Answer a conjunctive query: concepts reachable from EVERY anchor at once (A AND B). query_ckg walks outward from one concept. This intersects the reachable sets of two or more, which is the shape of most real questions — "the component that satisfies A AND applies to B". Neither anchor alone answers it; the answer lives in the overlap. Every branch is an exact set of declared edges, so the intersection is exact. A concept appears only if a declared path reaches it from each anchor. A relation missing from the graph produces an empty result, never a guess. Args: branches: Two or more branches. Either a bare anchor ("TensorRT-LLM"), which takes everything within `depth` hops, or an anchor plus an explicit relation path using '>' ("TensorRT-LLM > REQUIRES > ENABLES"), where each relation replaces the frontier. '*' matches any relation. Mix both forms freely. depth: Hops for bare-anchor branches, 1-5 (default 2). Ignored for explicit paths. direction: 'out' follows dependencies, 'in' follows them backwards, 'both' (default). mode: 'AND' (default) intersects branches; 'OR' unions them. limit: Max concepts listed, 1-200 (default 40). The true count is always shown. Returns: Markdown with the query plan and its per-step set sizes, then the answer set with taxonomy tags. Reports which branch was empty when the intersection is empty.

入力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "branches": {
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "title": "Branches",
      "type": "array"
    },
    "depth": {
      "default": 2,
      "title": "Depth",
      "type": "integer"
    },
    "direction": {
      "default": "both",
      "title": "Direction",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "mode": {
      "default": "AND",
      "title": "Mode",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "limit": {
      "default": 40,
      "title": "Limit",
      "type": "integer"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "branches"
  ],
  "title": "query_intersectArguments"
}

出力スキーマ

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "result": {
      "title": "Result",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "result"
  ],
  "title": "query_intersectOutput"
}

コミュニティ

このサーバーを評価する

エビデンス

最近の観測

検証済みバージョンは記録されていませんツール 8 件
検証済みバージョンは記録されていませんツール 8 件
検証済みバージョンは記録されていませんツール 8 件