Antevo Trademark

Is that brand name taken? Screen the registers and check the opposition window. No account.

사용해야 할까요

품질 및 안전성

A
설명 품질
100%
스키마 완전성
80%
이름 품질
80%
오염 위험
100%
권한 일치
100%
프로토콜 준수
100%

도구 정의와 프로토콜 준수에 대한 자동 분석을 기반으로 합니다.

컨텍스트 비용

~744토큰 (도구 정의)
~397 B일반적인 응답 크기
중간 정도의 주의 영향 (128k 컨텍스트의 0.58%)

이는 서버의 도구가 모델의 컨텍스트에 로드될 때마다 소비되는 대략적인 토큰 수입니다. 수치가 높을수록 다른 작업에 사용할 수 있는 주의가 줄어듭니다.

설치

원클릭 설치

`claude_desktop_config.json` 파일에 다음을 추가하세요:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "trademark": {
      "url": "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp"
    }
  }
}

원격 엔드포인트

https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcpstreamable-http

할 수 있는 일

도구 목록

도구 (4)

🟢 읽기 전용🟡 쓰기🔴 삭제⚪ 알 수 없음
🟢screen_mark(mark)

Screen a brand name against the live trademark registers. Free, no account. Returns every mark near it with a similarity tier, plus which registers were checked. This is the first thing to run when someone asks 'is my name taken'.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "mark": {
      "title": "Mark",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "mark"
  ],
  "title": "screen_markArguments"
}
🟢suggest_classes(description)

Which Nice classes a business like this files in. Free, no account, no database. The question people cannot answer for themselves: not "is my name taken" but "taken in WHAT". Nice has 45 classes and the numbering is opaque — software you download is class 9, software you log into is class 42, and selling other people's goods is class 35 whatever the goods are. Filing in one and not the other is the most expensive routine mistake in the process. Run this BEFORE screen_mark when someone describes a business rather than naming a class: the classes it returns are what makes a screen mean anything. Relay the reasoning, not just the numbers, and keep the closing caveat — this reports how similar businesses file, and their counsel decides what they actually file.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "description": {
      "title": "Description",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "description"
  ],
  "title": "suggest_classesArguments"
}
🟢holder_read(name)

Who a holder is and how they file — the read on an adversary. Free. Computed from their whole register book: how much of it they let lapse, whether their marks cluster where they trade or spray across unrelated classes, and the leverage that gives counsel. Present the evidence, not just the label — and never call anyone a squatter; that is a legal conclusion we do not assert.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "name": {
      "title": "Name",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "name"
  ],
  "title": "holder_readArguments"
}
🟢opposition_window(office)

How long you have to oppose a filing in a given trademark office, and from when. Twenty registers, each with the provision the window comes from. The trap this answers: most offices run opposition BEFORE registration, from publication of the application, but a minority — Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Sweden — register the mark first and run the window from publication of the REGISTRATION. Applying one office's rule to another invents a deadline that never existed. Accepts a country name, an office name or a two-letter code ('japan', 'JP', 'EU').

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "office": {
      "title": "Office",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "office"
  ],
  "title": "opposition_windowArguments"
}

권장 프롬프트

retrieve_data
Get details about [item] from Antevo Trademark
예상 도구: holder_read
fetch_info
Fetch [information type] using Antevo Trademark
예상 도구: holder_read

커뮤니티

이 서버 평가하기

증거

최근 관측

검증됨버전이 기록되지 않음도구 4개
검증됨버전이 기록되지 않음도구 4개