backlinkmcp-server

Backlink & domain authority MCP for AI agents: referring domains, link gap, toxic review queue

사용해야 할까요

품질 및 안전성

A
설명 품질
100%
스키마 완전성
99%
이름 품질
83%
오염 위험
100%
권한 일치
100%
프로토콜 준수
100%

도구 정의와 프로토콜 준수에 대한 자동 분석을 기반으로 합니다.

컨텍스트 비용

~2,751토큰 (도구 정의)
~1.1 KB일반적인 응답 크기
상당한 주의 영향 (128k 컨텍스트의 2.15%)

이는 서버의 도구가 모델의 컨텍스트에 로드될 때마다 소비되는 대략적인 토큰 수입니다. 수치가 높을수록 다른 작업에 사용할 수 있는 주의가 줄어듭니다.

설치

원클릭 설치

`claude_desktop_config.json` 파일에 다음을 추가하세요:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "backlinkmcp-server": {
      "url": "https://backlinkmcp.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

원격 엔드포인트

https://backlinkmcp.com/api/mcpstreamable-http

할 수 있는 일

도구 목록

도구 (13)

🟢 읽기 전용🟡 쓰기🔴 삭제⚪ 알 수 없음
🟢domain_authority_score(domain)

Get an editorial-authority score for a domain (weighted toward high-trust wiki/edu/gov/news referrers, from BacklinkMCP's proprietary web-scale link index). Returns a domain_rating-style score plus referring domain count.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "domain": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Root domain, e.g. 'stripe.com'."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "domain"
  ]
}
🟢top_linkers_for_domain(domain)

Return the top 25 domains linking to a given domain, ranked by the linking domain's own authority, with link counts. Good for a quick competitive/backlink-profile skim.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "domain": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Root domain, e.g. 'stripe.com'."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "domain"
  ]
}
🟢backlinks_for_domain(domain)

Full backlink payload for a domain: total inlink count plus the ranked list of linking domains (authority + outbound link count per linker). Returns up to 100 rows on Pro, 25 on the free tier; use domain_authority_score for just the headline number.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "domain": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Root domain, e.g. 'stripe.com'."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "domain"
  ]
}
🟢verify_link_live(domain, linkers, limit)

Live-verify backlinks: fetches linking domains' homepages RIGHT NOW and confirms an actual href to the target domain exists on each. Complements the index with real-time proof. Only homepages are fetched, so 'not_found' means 'no link on the homepage today', not 'the link is gone'. Checks the top 8 linkers by default (max 15).

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "domain": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Root domain whose backlinks to verify, e.g. 'stripe.com'."
    },
    "linkers": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "description": "Optional: specific linking domains to check (max 15). Defaults to the top linkers from the graph."
    },
    "limit": {
      "type": "integer",
      "description": "Optional: how many top linkers to check when 'linkers' is omitted (default 8, max 15)."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "domain"
  ]
}
🟢find_link_prospects(domain, competitors)

Competitor backlink-gap analysis for link building. Given YOUR domain (the `domain` arg) and 1-3 competitor domains, returns domains that link to the competitor(s) but NOT to you, ranked by the linking domain's authority — a warm outreach shortlist (aka competitor gap). Domain-level only: the index has no per-link URLs or anchor text, so each row is a DOMAIN worth pitching for a link, not a confirmed link or a specific page. CDN/analytics/marketing-widget/social noise is filtered out. Free mines 1 competitor and returns up to 25 prospects; Pro mines up to 3 competitors and returns up to 100.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "domain": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "YOUR root domain — the site you want more backlinks for, e.g. 'yoursite.com'."
    },
    "competitors": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "description": "Competitor root domains to mine for gap prospects (1-3), e.g. ['rival1.com','rival2.com']. Free tier uses only the first."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "domain",
    "competitors"
  ]
}
🟢flag_toxic_links(domain)

Toxic / low-quality backlink audit: scans a domain's LINKERS and flags spammy disavow CANDIDATES — abused TLDs (.tk/.xyz/.loan…), spam keywords in the domain, hyphen/keyword stuffing, and link-farm-level outbound counts. The inverse of find_link_prospects. Domain-level heuristic only (no per-link URL/anchor), so each row is a DOMAIN worth REVIEWING, never a confirmed toxic link. Note: Google says most sites should NOT disavow — use this to audit, not to auto-disavow. Free returns up to 25 flags, Pro up to 100.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "domain": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The domain whose inbound links you want to audit for toxic/spam linkers, e.g. 'yoursite.com'."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "domain"
  ]
}
🟢common_linkers(domains)

Multi-domain backlink overlap: given 2-4 domains, returns the domains that link to MORE THAN ONE of them, ranked by overlap (how many of the set they link) then authority. Answers 'who links my whole niche?' — the must-have publications, directories, and roundups your competitors all share. Domain-level only (no per-link URL/anchor). Free compares 2 domains, Pro up to 4; returns up to 25 rows free / 100 Pro.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "domains": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "description": "Root domains to intersect (2-4), e.g. ['a.com','b.com','c.com']. Free tier uses only the first 2."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "domains"
  ]
}
🟢ai_visibility_report(domain, competitors, prompts, category, mode, ...)

AI Visibility / GEO audit. Asks a panel of AI models a buyer-intent question ('what's the best <category>?') and reports whether YOUR brand gets recommended, who the models prefer instead (share-of-voice across the panel), WHY the leader wins — diagnosed against BacklinkMCP's own authority/link data (referring-domain gap) — and which domains to earn links from to catch up. Two modes: `parametric` (default — the models' baked-in brand memory) or `retrieval` (live web-search models = what the AI answers right now, SEO-driven). **Pro plan only** (runs a live multi-model AI panel): 8 models × 3 prompts × up to 4 competitors per report.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "domain": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "YOUR root domain — the brand you're measuring AI visibility for, e.g. 'yoursite.com'."
    },
    "competitors": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "description": "Competitor root domains to track share-of-voice against and diagnose the winner, e.g. ['rival1.com','rival2.com']. Supplying the winner as a domain unlocks the link-gap diagnosis."
    },
    "prompts": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "description": "Buyer-intent queries to ask the panel, e.g. ['best project management tool for a startup']."
    },
    "category": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional shortcut used only if `prompts` is omitted — turned into one prompt 'What is the best <category>?', e.g. 'CRM for small business'."
    },
    "mode": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "parametric",
        "retrieval"
      ],
      "description": "'parametric' (default) = the models' baked-in brand memory (cheap). 'retrieval' = live web-search models (what the AI answers now, SEO-driven; costs more credits)."
    },
    "facts": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "description": "Optional ground-truth facts about YOUR product (max 5), e.g. ['pricing starts at $29/mo','has a free tier']. When supplied, the panel is also asked what it knows about your brand and each fact is verified — separating 'AI doesn't know you' from 'AI knows you but gets it wrong' (opposite fixes)."
    },
    "depth": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "draft",
        "full"
      ],
      "description": "'draft' = cheap iteration pass (2 models × 1 prompt) for trying prompts/competitors. 'full' (default) = the whole panel. Draft costs 1 credit (2 for retrieval)."
    },
    "history": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "true = return the permanent archive of past runs for this domain (mention rate, rank, leader over time) instead of running a new panel. Costs no credits. Optionally combine with `mode` to filter parametric vs retrieval history."
    },
    "samples": {
      "type": "integer",
      "minimum": 1,
      "maximum": 10,
      "description": "Repeat draws per (prompt×model) cell (default 1, max 10). Answer engines are nondeterministic — more samples tighten the 95% confidence interval on your rates. Use samples>=5 for a defensible inclusion rate; 1 is a smoke test, not a measurement. Credits multiply by samples."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "domain"
  ]
}
🟢ai_crawler_audit(domain)

Audit which AI crawlers a site allows or blocks in robots.txt — sorted by CONSEQUENCE: blocking a VISIBILITY crawler (OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-User…) removes the site from live AI answers, while blocking a TRAINING crawler (GPTBot, CCBot, Google-Extended…) only opts out of model training. Those need opposite decisions. Checks 25 known AI crawlers + whether /llms.txt exists, plus general robots.txt hygiene (Sitemap directives, whole-site Disallow foot-guns). Free (no LLM calls).

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "domain": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Root domain to audit, e.g. 'yoursite.com'."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "domain"
  ]
}
🟢site_audit(url)

Fetch a page and audit core on-page SEO signals: title/meta description length, canonical tag, heading structure, image alt text coverage, viewport tag, robots meta, word count. Returns a list of concrete issues found. Single page only — not a site crawl.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Full page URL, e.g. https://example.com/page"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ]
}
🟢schema_validate(url)

Extract and validate JSON-LD structured data (schema.org) from a page. Checks JSON validity and flags missing recommended fields for common types (Article, Product, Organization, WebSite, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, LocalBusiness).

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Full page URL to check for structured data."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ]
}
🟢core_web_vitals(url, strategy)

Get Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) and a performance score for a page via Google PageSpeed Insights — both a lab Lighthouse run and real-user CrUX field data when available.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Full page URL to test."
    },
    "strategy": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "mobile",
        "desktop"
      ],
      "description": "Test as mobile or desktop. Default 'mobile'."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ]
}
🟡indexnow_submit(urls, key)

Submit one or more URLs to IndexNow for near-instant indexing by Bing and Yandex. Requires an IndexNow key that YOU control and have already hosted at https://<your-domain>/<key>.txt — this tool does not create that key for you.

입력 스키마

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "urls": {
      "oneOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "string"
          },
          "maxItems": 10000
        }
      ],
      "description": "One URL or an array of URLs, all on the same host."
    },
    "key": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Your IndexNow key, already hosted at https://<host>/<key>.txt"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "urls",
    "key"
  ]
}

커뮤니티

이 서버 평가하기

증거

최근 관측

검증됨버전이 기록되지 않음도구 13개
검증됨버전이 기록되지 않음도구 13개