mcp

Public MCP server for the LLM Search Engine

我该使用它吗

质量与安全性

B
描述质量
100%
模式完整度
74%
命名质量
96%
投毒风险
0%
权限匹配度
100%
协议合规性
100%

发现(8)

  • HIGHTool poisoning patterns detected
  • MEDIUMTool description contains URL to non-standard domain在 classify_url 中
  • MEDIUMTool description contains URL to non-standard domain在 analyze_seo 中
  • MEDIUMTool description contains URL to non-standard domain在 analyze_eeat 中
  • MEDIUMTool description contains URL to non-standard domain在 analyze_aeo 中
  • MEDIUMTool description contains URL to non-standard domain在 analyze_wcag 中
  • MEDIUMTool description contains URL to non-standard domain在 analyze_readability 中
  • MEDIUMTool description contains URL to non-standard domain在 audit 中

基于对工具定义和协议合规性的自动分析。

上下文开销

~3,748token 数(工具定义)
~893 B典型响应大小
对注意力有显著影响(占 128k 上下文窗口的 2.93%)

这是每次将服务器的工具加载到模型上下文窗口时所消耗的大致 token 数。数值越高,可用于其他任务的注意力就越少。

安装

一键安装

将以下内容添加到你的 `claude_desktop_config.json` 文件中:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp": {
      "url": "https://llmse.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

远程端点

https://llmse.ai/mcpstreamable-http

它能做什么

工具清单

工具(10)

🟢 只读🟡 写入🔴 删除⚪ 未知
⚪classify_url(url)

Classify a website URL into category, subcategory, language, and sentiment. Fetches the URL content and uses AI for classification. Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to classify (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: Classification result with: - url: The normalized URL - category: Main category (e.g., "Sports", "Technology") - subcategory: Specific subcategory - language: Detected content language - sentiment: Content sentiment (Good/Neutral/Bad) - age: Target age group (if available) - gender: Target gender (if available) - cached: Whether result was from cache

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "title": "Url",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ],
  "title": "classify_urlArguments"
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "title": "classify_urlDictOutput"
}
🟢select_advertiser(url, category, subcategory, age, gender, ...)

Select the best advertisers based on website demographics. Matches advertisers to website content based on classification demographics. Provide either a URL (classification will be fetched) or demographics directly. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain when using URL. Scoring weights: - Category match: +10 points - Age match: +5 points - Gender match: +3 points - Sentiment match: +2 points - Higher CPM bid as tiebreaker Args: url: URL to match advertisers for (fetches classification from cache). category: Target category (e.g., "Sports", "Automotive"). subcategory: Target subcategory. age: Target age group (e.g., "18-24", "25-34", "31-51"). gender: Target gender ("male", "female", or "all"). sentiment: Content sentiment ("Good", "Neutral", or "Bad"). limit: Number of advertisers to return (1-10, default 3). min_cpm: Minimum CPM cost filter (e.g., 5.0 for $5+ CPM). max_cpm: Maximum CPM cost filter (e.g., 10.0 for $10 or less CPM). Returns: Dictionary with: - matches: List of matched advertisers with scores - match_count: Number of matches found - classification: URL classification (if URL provided) - demographics: Provided demographics (if no URL)

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Url"
    },
    "category": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Category"
    },
    "subcategory": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Subcategory"
    },
    "age": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Age"
    },
    "gender": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Gender"
    },
    "sentiment": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Sentiment"
    },
    "limit": {
      "default": 3,
      "title": "Limit",
      "type": "integer"
    },
    "min_cpm": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "number"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Min Cpm"
    },
    "max_cpm": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "number"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Max Cpm"
    }
  },
  "title": "select_advertiserArguments"
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "title": "select_advertiserDictOutput"
}
🟢analyze_seo(url)

Analyze a website URL for SEO optimizations. Fetches the URL content and analyzes HTML for possible SEO improvements. Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to analyze (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: SEO analysis result with: - url: The analyzed URL - score: Overall SEO score (0-100) - grade: Letter grade (A-F) - issues: List of SEO issues found (critical, warnings, info) - meta: Extracted meta information (title, description, headings, etc.) - recommendations: Prioritized list of improvements - cached: Whether result was from cache

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "title": "Url",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ],
  "title": "analyze_seoArguments"
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "title": "analyze_seoDictOutput"
}
🟢analyze_eeat(url)

Analyze a website URL for E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Evaluates content quality signals based on Google's Search Quality Rater Guidelines and "Creating helpful content" documentation. Detects EEAT signals including: - Experience: First-person language, case studies, testimonials, years of experience - Expertise: Author credentials, certifications, professional memberships, topic depth - Authoritativeness: Organization schema, awards, trust badges, media mentions - Trustworthiness: HTTPS, contact info, privacy policy, source citations Also detects YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) content for health, financial, and legal topics. Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to analyze (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: EEAT analysis result with: - url: The analyzed URL - score: Overall EEAT score (0-100) - grade: Letter grade (A-F) - scores: Individual category scores (experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness) - issues: Categorized issues (critical, warnings, info) - signals: Detected EEAT signals - meta: Extracted meta information - recommendations: Prioritized list of improvements - cached: Whether result was from cache

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "title": "Url",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ],
  "title": "analyze_eeatArguments"
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "title": "analyze_eeatDictOutput"
}
🟢analyze_aeo(url)

Analyze how well content is optimized for AI answer engines. Evaluates content for AI answer engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude). Combines Q&A pattern detection, snippet extractability, and entity clarity analysis with a full Citation Readiness assessment. AEO Scoring Framework (100 points): - Answer Format Detection: 30 points (Q&A extractability patterns) - FAQ Schema Presence: 20 points (FAQPage schema markup) - HowTo Schema Presence: 15 points (HowTo schema markup) - Direct Answer Snippets: 20 points (short extractable blocks <50 words) - Entity Clarity Score: 15 points (clear entity definitions) Neutral Schema Scoring: If no FAQ/HowTo-style content detected, those schema metrics score full points rather than penalizing. Grade Scale: A (85-100), B (70-84), C (55-69), D (40-54), F (0-39) Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to analyze (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: AEO analysis with: - url: The analyzed URL - aeo_score: Overall AEO score (0-100) - aeo_grade: Letter grade (A-F) - aeo_metrics: Individual metric scores - citation: Full Citation Readiness analysis (score, grade, issues, signals) - issues: Problems detected (critical, warnings, info) - signals: Positive signals detected - recommendations: Prioritized improvements - cached: Whether result was from cache

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "title": "Url",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ],
  "title": "analyze_aeoArguments"
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "title": "analyze_aeoDictOutput"
}
🟢analyze_wcag(url)

Analyze a website URL for WCAG 2.1 Level A accessibility issues. Automated static HTML analysis covering approximately 30-40% of WCAG 2.1 Level A criteria. Checks include: image alt text, form labels, heading hierarchy, page title, html lang, empty links/buttons, ARIA labels, duplicate IDs, skip navigation, table headers, landmarks, viewport zoom, autoplay media, and tabindex ordering. Manual testing is required for full WCAG compliance assessment. Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to analyze (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: WCAG analysis with: - url: The analyzed URL - score: Accessibility score (0-100) - grade: Letter grade (A-F) - issues: Categorized issues (critical, warnings, info) - meta: Extracted accessibility metadata - recommendations: Prioritized improvements - coverage_note: Disclaimer about automated coverage - cached: Whether result was from cache

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "title": "Url",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ],
  "title": "analyze_wcagArguments"
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "title": "analyze_wcagDictOutput"
}
🟢analyze_garm(category, sentiment, url)

Compute GARM brand safety score for a website or category. Based on the GARM (Global Alliance for Responsible Media) Brand Suitability Framework. Maps content categories to 11 GARM sensitive content categories with risk levels (Floor, High, Medium, Low). Can either: 1. Provide a URL - classification will be fetched and mapped to GARM 2. Provide category and sentiment directly for instant scoring Score interpretation: higher = safer for advertising. Floor categories (e.g., Adult) always score 0/F regardless of sentiment. Args: category: LLMSE category (e.g., "Adult", "Politics", "Sports"). sentiment: Content sentiment ("Bad", "Neutral", "Good"). url: Optional URL to analyze (fetches classification from cache). Returns: GARM brand safety analysis with: - score: Brand safety score (0-100, higher = safer) - grade: Letter grade (A-F) - garm_category: Matched GARM category name or None - risk_level: "floor"|"high"|"medium"|"low"|"none" - is_floor: True if not suitable for any advertising - issues: Categorized issues {critical, warnings, info} - recommendations: Improvement suggestions

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "category": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Category"
    },
    "sentiment": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Sentiment"
    },
    "url": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Url"
    }
  },
  "title": "analyze_garmArguments"
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "title": "analyze_garmDictOutput"
}
🟢analyze_readability(url)

Analyze a website URL for content readability using Flesch Reading Ease. Extracts plain text from HTML and computes readability metrics including Flesch Reading Ease score, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, reading time, and word/sentence statistics. Grade Scale (web-optimized): - A (60-100): Easy, 6th-8th grade — ideal for web content - B (50-59): Fairly easy, some high school - C (30-49): Standard, college level - D (10-29): Difficult, graduate level - F (0-9): Very difficult, professional/academic Results are cached for fast subsequent lookups. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to analyze (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: Readability analysis with: - url: The analyzed URL - score: Flesch Reading Ease score (0-100, higher = easier) - grade: Letter grade (A-F) - flesch_kincaid_grade_level: US school grade level equivalent - reading_time_minutes: Estimated reading time in minutes - word_count: Total word count - sentence_count: Total sentence count - difficult_words: Count of difficult/uncommon words - cached: Whether result was from cache

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "title": "Url",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ],
  "title": "analyze_readabilityArguments"
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "title": "analyze_readabilityDictOutput"
}
🟢audit(url)

Perform comprehensive audit of a website URL. Fetches the URL content ONCE and provides a combined report with: - Classification: category, subcategory, language, sentiment, demographics - SEO Analysis: score, grade, issues, recommendations - EEAT Analysis: experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness scores - AEO Analysis: AI answer engine optimization score, metrics, issues, signals (includes full Citation Readiness analysis in the nested 'citation' key) - Advertiser Matching: best-fit advertising networks with scores - Similar Sites: competitor/related sites from the same category This is more efficient than calling classify_url, analyze_seo, analyze_eeat, analyze_aeo, select_advertiser, and find_similar_sites separately as it only fetches the page once. Args: url: The website URL to audit (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: Comprehensive audit report with: - url: The analyzed URL - classification: Category, subcategory, language, sentiment, demographics - seo: Score, grade, issues, recommendations - eeat: EEAT score, grade, category scores, issues, signals - aeo: AEO score, grade, metrics, issues, signals (includes citation results) - advertisers: Matched advertising networks with scores - similar_sites: Related sites from the same category (up to 10) - cached: Whether result was from cache

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "title": "Url",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ],
  "title": "auditArguments"
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "title": "auditDictOutput"
}
🟢find_similar_sites(url, limit)

Find similar or competitor websites based on classification. Takes a URL, classifies it (or uses cached classification), and returns other websites from the same category and subcategory. Useful for competitive analysis and discovering related content. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to find similar sites for. limit: Maximum number of similar sites to return (1-50, default 10). Returns: Dictionary with: - url: The input URL (normalized) - classification: The URL's category and subcategory - similar_sites: List of similar URLs from the same category - total_in_category: Total sites in this category/subcategory - cached: Whether the classification was from cache

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "title": "Url",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "limit": {
      "default": 10,
      "title": "Limit",
      "type": "integer"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "url"
  ],
  "title": "find_similar_sitesArguments"
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "title": "find_similar_sitesDictOutput"
}

推荐提示词

search_research
Search for information about [topic] using mcp
预期工具: find_similar_sites
find_specific
Find [specific item] using mcp
预期工具: find_similar_sites
retrieve_data
Get details about [item] from mcp
预期工具: analyze_readability
fetch_info
Fetch [information type] using mcp
预期工具: analyze_readability
research_workflow
Search for [topic], then get detailed information about the top results using mcp
预期工具: find_similar_sitesanalyze_readability

社区

评价此服务器

证据

最近观测

已验证未记录版本10 个工具
已验证未记录版本10 个工具
已验证未记录版本10 个工具