Antevo Trademark

Is that brand name taken? Screen the registers and check the opposition window. No account.

我该使用它吗

质量与安全性

A
描述质量
100%
模式完整度
80%
命名质量
80%
投毒风险
100%
权限匹配度
100%
协议合规性
100%

基于对工具定义和协议合规性的自动分析。

上下文开销

~744token 数(工具定义)
~397 B典型响应大小
对注意力有中等影响(占 128k 上下文窗口的 0.58%)

这是每次将服务器的工具加载到模型上下文窗口时所消耗的大致 token 数。数值越高,可用于其他任务的注意力就越少。

安装

一键安装

将以下内容添加到你的 `claude_desktop_config.json` 文件中:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "trademark": {
      "url": "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp"
    }
  }
}

远程端点

https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcpstreamable-http

它能做什么

工具清单

工具(4)

🟢 只读🟡 写入🔴 删除⚪ 未知
🟢screen_mark(mark)

Screen a brand name against the live trademark registers. Free, no account. Returns every mark near it with a similarity tier, plus which registers were checked. This is the first thing to run when someone asks 'is my name taken'.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "mark": {
      "title": "Mark",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "mark"
  ],
  "title": "screen_markArguments"
}
🟢suggest_classes(description)

Which Nice classes a business like this files in. Free, no account, no database. The question people cannot answer for themselves: not "is my name taken" but "taken in WHAT". Nice has 45 classes and the numbering is opaque — software you download is class 9, software you log into is class 42, and selling other people's goods is class 35 whatever the goods are. Filing in one and not the other is the most expensive routine mistake in the process. Run this BEFORE screen_mark when someone describes a business rather than naming a class: the classes it returns are what makes a screen mean anything. Relay the reasoning, not just the numbers, and keep the closing caveat — this reports how similar businesses file, and their counsel decides what they actually file.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "description": {
      "title": "Description",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "description"
  ],
  "title": "suggest_classesArguments"
}
🟢holder_read(name)

Who a holder is and how they file — the read on an adversary. Free. Computed from their whole register book: how much of it they let lapse, whether their marks cluster where they trade or spray across unrelated classes, and the leverage that gives counsel. Present the evidence, not just the label — and never call anyone a squatter; that is a legal conclusion we do not assert.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "name": {
      "title": "Name",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "name"
  ],
  "title": "holder_readArguments"
}
🟢opposition_window(office)

How long you have to oppose a filing in a given trademark office, and from when. Twenty registers, each with the provision the window comes from. The trap this answers: most offices run opposition BEFORE registration, from publication of the application, but a minority — Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Sweden — register the mark first and run the window from publication of the REGISTRATION. Applying one office's rule to another invents a deadline that never existed. Accepts a country name, an office name or a two-letter code ('japan', 'JP', 'EU').

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "office": {
      "title": "Office",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "office"
  ],
  "title": "opposition_windowArguments"
}

推荐提示词

retrieve_data
Get details about [item] from Antevo Trademark
预期工具: holder_read
fetch_info
Fetch [information type] using Antevo Trademark
预期工具: holder_read

社区

评价此服务器

证据

最近观测

已验证未记录版本4 个工具
已验证未记录版本4 个工具