Design Check

Scores whether a page reads as AI-generated and names the tells to fix.

我该使用它吗

质量与安全性

A
描述质量
100%
模式完整度
97%
命名质量
100%
投毒风险
100%
权限匹配度
100%
协议合规性
100%

基于对工具定义和协议合规性的自动分析。

上下文开销

~509token 数(工具定义)
~432 B典型响应大小
对注意力的影响极小(占 128k 上下文窗口的 0.40%)

这是每次将服务器的工具加载到模型上下文窗口时所消耗的大致 token 数。数值越高,可用于其他任务的注意力就越少。

安装

一键安装

将以下内容添加到你的 `claude_desktop_config.json` 文件中:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "designcheck": {
      "url": "https://designcheck.allthepossibles.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

远程端点

https://designcheck.allthepossibles.com/mcpstreamable-http

它能做什么

工具清单

工具(3)

🟢 只读🟡 写入🔴 删除⚪ 未知
🟢check_design(url, html)

Check a page's HTML/CSS/copy/interaction for the patterns that make AI-generated work read as generic: default fonts, soft tech gradients, pill+arrow buttons, eyebrow labels, a composition with no real width/background variation across sections, uniform card grids, copy tells (AI vocabulary, negative-parallel framing, hedge words, heavy em-dash use), and experience gaps (a diagnosis with no next step, dead-end links). Every finding includes a concrete fix. Call this before presenting UI to a human.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "url": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Page to fetch and check"
    },
    "html": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Raw HTML/CSS to check directly, if not fetching a URL"
    }
  }
}
🟢check_copy(text)

Check marketing or outreach copy (an email, a landing-page draft, a pitch, a social post) for the tells that make it read as AI-generated: cliché vocabulary (delve, unlock, empower, seamlessly integrate, etc.), negative-parallel framing ("not just X, but Y"), hedge words, heavy em-dash use, and diagnosing a problem with no fix in the same breath. No page or markup needed, just the text. Call this before sending copy to a human.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "text": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The raw copy to check"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "text"
  ]
}
🟢check_code(code)

Check a source file or diff for AI 'tells' left in comments: narrating fulfilling a request instead of describing the code ("as requested," "I've added," "here's the updated version") and hedge words. These reveal there was a conversation behind the change that a later reader has no access to. Call this before committing or shipping code an agent wrote.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "code": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The source file or diff to check"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "code"
  ]
}

社区

评价此服务器

证据

最近观测

已验证未记录版本3 个工具