Alternative Asset Literacy — Retail

Alternative-asset education for retail investors: deep-dive tracks, calculators, advisor lookup.

我该使用它吗

质量与安全性

B
描述质量
98%
模式完整度
60%
命名质量
48%
投毒风险
100%
权限匹配度
90%
协议合规性
100%

发现(27)

  • LOWTool 'facts.random' description lacks action verb在 facts.random 中
  • LOWTool 'glossary.lookup' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 glossary.lookup 中
  • LOWTool 'glossary.search' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 glossary.search 中
  • LOWTool 'glossary.browse' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 glossary.browse 中
  • LOWTool 'learn.list_modules' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 learn.list_modules 中
  • LOWTool 'learn.module' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 learn.module 中
  • LOWTool 'facts.random' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 facts.random 中
  • LOWTool 'toolkit.frameworks' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 toolkit.frameworks 中
  • LOWTool 'behavioral.brain_map' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 behavioral.brain_map 中
  • LOWTool 'art.learning_track' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 art.learning_track 中

基于对工具定义和协议合规性的自动分析。

上下文开销

~4,082token 数(工具定义)
~879 B典型响应大小
对注意力有显著影响(占 128k 上下文窗口的 3.19%)

这是每次将服务器的工具加载到模型上下文窗口时所消耗的大致 token 数。数值越高,可用于其他任务的注意力就越少。

安装

一键安装

将以下内容添加到你的 `claude_desktop_config.json` 文件中:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aal-retail-mcp": {
      "url": "https://alternativeassetliteracy.com/mcp/retail"
    }
  }
}

远程端点

https://alternativeassetliteracy.com/mcp/retailstreamable-http

它能做什么

工具清单

工具(22)

🟢 只读🟡 写入🔴 删除⚪ 未知
🟢glossary.lookup(term)

Look up a term from the app's 351-term glossary — always free in the app, always free here. Spans alternative assets, DeFi, ESG, behavioral economics, art, and gender lens investing.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "term": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The financial term to look up"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "term"
  ]
}
🟢glossary.search(query, limit)

Full-text search across all 351 glossary terms and definitions.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "query": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Keyword or phrase to search"
    },
    "limit": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Max results (default 10, max 50)"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "query"
  ]
}
🟢glossary.browse(category, limit)

Browse all 351 glossary terms by category (Alternative Assets, Art, DeFi & Crypto, ESG & Climate, Behavioral Economics, Gender Lens Investing).

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "category": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Category to browse. Omit for all."
    },
    "limit": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Max terms (default 25, max 100)"
    }
  }
}
🟢learn.list_modules

Lists all 9 learning modules with a short description and whether each is free in full or preview-only — the same index as the app's own Learn tab.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "modules": {
      "type": "array"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "modules"
  ]
}
🟢learn.module(module_id)

Returns the actual content (sections, quiz preview) for a learning module, gated exactly like the app: one module free in full, every other module capped at its first section(s)/quiz with the rest listed by title only and a link to subscribe for full access.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "module_id": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Module id or title (e.g. 'mod_art', 'Art as Investment') — see learn.list_modules for the full list"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "module_id"
  ]
}
🟢facts.random(category)

A short, sourced statistic about women & finance, behavioral economics, alternative investing, or the art market.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "category": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "Women & Finance",
        "Behavioral Economics",
        "Alternative Investing",
        "Art Market"
      ],
      "description": "Optional category filter. Omit for any category."
    }
  }
}
🟢toolkit.frameworks

Full due-diligence/risk/tax checklists for an active plugin subscription (independent of the app's own subscription); otherwise titles and categories only, with a link to subscribe.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "items": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "items",
    "locked"
  ]
}
🟢behavioral.brain_map

Full content (hijack patterns, navigation strategies) for an active plugin subscription; otherwise the 4 region names and one-line functions only, with a link to subscribe.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "regions": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "regions",
    "locked"
  ]
}
🟢art.learning_track

Full lesson content (including 'Female Artists: An Overlooked Asset Class') for an active plugin subscription; otherwise the 3 track titles and lesson titles only, with a link to subscribe.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "tracks": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "tracks",
    "locked"
  ]
}
🟢art.library

Full summaries for an active plugin subscription; otherwise book/podcast/paper titles and authors only, with a link to subscribe.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "items": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "items",
    "locked"
  ]
}
🟢reading.list(category)

The app's curated reading list spanning behavioral economics, venture capital, economic history, and policy — always free in the app, always free here.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "category": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional category filter."
    }
  }
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "items": {
      "type": "array"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "items"
  ]
}
🟢disclosures.get

Returns the full regulatory disclosure, accredited investor definition, and risk disclosure that apply to this plugin's content — the same language used in the app itself. Call this any time a user asks about risk, eligibility, or what this content legally is/isn't.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "regulatory": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "accredited_investor": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "risk": {
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "regulatory",
    "accredited_investor",
    "risk"
  ]
}
🟢explain.holding(holding_type)

The complement to third-party MCP connectors that bridge your live brokerage accounts (Fidelity/Schwab/Vanguard-style) into Claude — those show WHAT you own; this explains what it IS. Given an asset type, returns the plain-language glossary term(s) always; for an active plugin subscription, also returns the specific cognitive bias most likely to distort how people think about this asset type and a due-diligence angle, otherwise a locked note.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "holding_type": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The asset type, e.g. 'private equity fund', 'DeFi position', 'art fund', 'ESG fund'"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "holding_type"
  ]
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "terms": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "terms",
    "locked"
  ]
}
🟢gender_lens.learning_track

A dedicated track on investing through a gender lens, treated as its own subject rather than a subcategory of ESG — the wealth gap in real numbers, the underfunding of women-led ventures as a genuine investment thesis, how the strategy works across public and private markets, the history behind the gap, and what the peer-reviewed research does and doesn't support. Full narrative content for an active plugin subscription; otherwise lesson titles and key takeaways only.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "title": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "lessons": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "title",
    "lessons",
    "locked"
  ]
}
🟢gdr.deep_dive_track

A recently proposed (2026), NOT institutionally adopted alternative to GDP — measuring an economy by what it regenerates (ecological, social, and capital dimensions, treated as interdependent) rather than what it produces. Explicitly caveated throughout as an unvalidated, single-thought-leader framework, grounded against decades of real, verified 'beyond GDP' precedent (Bhutan's Gross National Happiness Index, the UN's SEEA Ecosystem Accounting standard, state-level Genuine Progress Indicators, Doughnut Economics). Worth knowing as part of doing your own homework on an investment thesis before acting on it. Full narrative content for an active plugin subscription; otherwise lesson titles and key takeaways only.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "title": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "lessons": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "title",
    "lessons",
    "locked"
  ]
}
🟢vc_pe.deep_dive_track

Why venture capital and private equity exist as their own category of investing, a full breakdown of what 'accredited investor' actually means and the real risk behind that gate (illiquidity, failure rates, manager dependency), and what a family office is — including the real 2026 cost and AUM-threshold numbers behind single-family vs. multi-family office structures. Full narrative content for an active plugin subscription; otherwise lesson titles and key takeaways only.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "title": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "lessons": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "title",
    "lessons",
    "locked"
  ]
}
🟢rwa.deep_dive_track

How traditional assets — Treasury bills, money-market funds, private credit, real estate — get represented as on-chain tokens, who actually holds the underlying asset, where '24/7 instant liquidity' claims hold up and where they don't, and what U.S. regulators have said about it as of early 2026. Grounded in SEC primary sources and live tokenized-asset market data. Full narrative content for an active plugin subscription; otherwise lesson titles and key takeaways only.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "title": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "lessons": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "title",
    "lessons",
    "locked"
  ]
}
🟢pe_secondaries.deep_dive_track

What a GP-led continuation fund actually is, the structural conflict of interest at its center seen from both the GP's and the LP's side, who has a stake in the outcome without a vote (portfolio-company employees, never accredited LPs themselves), the behavioral trap built into the 'roll or cash out' decision, and an honest look at whether longer hold periods serve patient capital or deferred accountability — including a carefully-hedged gender-lens hypothesis. Full narrative content for an active plugin subscription; otherwise lesson titles and key takeaways only.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "title": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "lessons": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "title",
    "lessons",
    "locked"
  ]
}
🟢alts.illiquidity_pacing_stress_test(annual_commitment, vintage_years, fund_life_years, investment_period_years, rate_of_contribution, ...)

A real computation, not templated text: models what a multi-year program of private-fund commitments (PE, VC, private credit, etc.) actually does to your cash flow over its life — capital calls, distributions, unrealized value, and the single worst year for net cash flow — using a simplified, transparent adaptation of the Takahashi-Alexander pacing framework used in institutional private-markets planning. Runs against multiple named forward-looking growth scenarios by default, not just a historical-average assumption, so the result is a range, not one confident number. Pass annual_liquidity_budget to see exactly which years a stated liquidity budget would be breached. A free preview shows the peak liquidity need under one scenario; full multi-scenario comparison and year-by-year detail require a plugin subscription.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "annual_commitment": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Dollar amount you'd commit to new private-fund vintages each year"
    },
    "vintage_years": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "How many consecutive years you keep making new commitments (default 5)"
    },
    "fund_life_years": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Assumed life of each fund vintage in years (default 12)"
    },
    "investment_period_years": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Years each vintage actively calls capital before calls stop (default 5)"
    },
    "rate_of_contribution": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Fraction of a vintage's uncalled capital called per year during its investment period (default 0.30)"
    },
    "rate_of_distribution": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Base annual distribution rate applied to unrealized value, back-loaded via a bow curve (default 0.20)"
    },
    "annual_liquidity_budget": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Optional — your actual annual liquidity budget for capital calls, to flag years it would be breached"
    },
    "scenario": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "A single scenario id (historical_baseline, regime_transition, ai_productivity_acceleration, structural_stagnation) to run one scenario only — omit to see the full range (subscription required)"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "annual_commitment"
  ]
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "scenarios": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "scenarios"
  ]
}
🟢advisors.women_focused_directory

A discovery resource, not a recommendation — durable, self-updating advisor-search networks (NAPFA, XY Planning Network's Women's Finance filter, Garrett Planning Network, CFP Board) plus a short list of individually verified fee-only firms with a genuine, publicly-stated focus on women clients or gender-lens investing, each with the specific public statement it's grounded in. Built on real demand data: McKinsey/Cerulli research on women as a large, fast-growing, and demonstrably underserved segment of financial-advice demand. Free preview shows the durable networks and firm names; full verification details and public-statement citations require a plugin subscription.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {}
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "durable_networks": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "firms": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "durable_networks",
    "firms"
  ]
}
🟢retirement.monte_carlo_estimator(current_age, retirement_age, life_expectancy, current_savings, annual_contribution, ...)

A real Monte Carlo simulation — thousands of trials, not one deterministic projection — estimating the odds your savings and contributions support your stated retirement income target. Deliberately does NOT assume a fixed withdrawal rule like the '4% rule,' since that figure is itself an output of one specific historical regime, not a law; you state your own target income and the tool reports the odds under each named forward-looking scenario. Runs across multiple market-assumptions.js scenarios by default (historical baseline, regime transition, AI-productivity acceleration, structural stagnation) so you see how sensitive your plan actually is to an assumption most calculators bake in silently. Pair with alts.illiquidity_pacing_stress_test to see how an alternative-asset allocation affects overall retirement success odds. Free preview shows the success rate under one scenario; full multi-scenario comparison and percentile detail require a plugin subscription.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "current_age": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Your current age in years"
    },
    "retirement_age": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "The age you plan to retire and begin withdrawals"
    },
    "life_expectancy": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Planning horizon age (default 90)"
    },
    "current_savings": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Current portfolio balance in today's (real) dollars"
    },
    "annual_contribution": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Amount contributed per year, in today's (real) dollars, during the years between current_age and retirement_age"
    },
    "desired_annual_retirement_income": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Your own target annual retirement income in today's (real) dollars — required; this tool will not assume a withdrawal rate for you"
    },
    "equity_weight": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Fraction of the portfolio in equity-like assets, 0-1 (default 0.6)"
    },
    "scenario": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "A single scenario id to run one scenario only — omit to see the full range (subscription required)"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "current_age",
    "retirement_age",
    "current_savings",
    "annual_contribution",
    "desired_annual_retirement_income"
  ]
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "scenarios": {
      "type": "array"
    },
    "locked": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "scenarios"
  ]
}
🟢advisors.registration_check(query, search_type)

Free, live lookup against the public, unauthenticated SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) and FINRA BrokerCheck registries — no subscription required for this tool. Returns registration scope (active/inactive, broker-dealer and/or investment-adviser) and whether the public record has any disclosure event on file, merged from both sources since each surfaces a different half of the disclosure picture. Always a starting point for your own due diligence, never a substitute for reading the full public record.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "query": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The advisor or firm name to search for"
    },
    "search_type": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "individual",
        "firm"
      ],
      "description": "Whether to search for a person or a firm"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "query",
    "search_type"
  ]
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "results": {
      "type": "array"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "results"
  ]
}

社区

评价此服务器

证据

最近观测

已验证未记录版本22 个工具
已验证未记录版本22 个工具