Words in Context

Words-in-context vocabulary practice questions with distractor explanations.

我该使用它吗

质量与安全性

A
描述质量
100%
模式完整度
97%
命名质量
100%
投毒风险
100%
权限匹配度
100%
协议合规性
100%

基于对工具定义和协议合规性的自动分析。

上下文开销

~1,126token 数(工具定义)
~1.7 KB典型响应大小
对注意力有中等影响(占 128k 上下文窗口的 0.88%)

这是每次将服务器的工具加载到模型上下文窗口时所消耗的大致 token 数。数值越高,可用于其他任务的注意力就越少。

安装

一键安装

将以下内容添加到你的 `claude_desktop_config.json` 文件中:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "words-in-context": {
      "url": "https://words-in-context.gumballtools.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

远程端点

https://words-in-context.gumballtools.com/api/mcpstreamable-http

它能做什么

工具清单

工具(3)

🟢 只读🟡 写入🔴 删除⚪ 未知
🟢draw_items(count, difficulty, theme, seed)

Draw words-in-context vocabulary practice questions from a curated, human-written bank. Use this to quiz a learner, build a practice set, or check what a question of this type looks like. It is free, deterministic, and costs no inference. IMPORTANT: the response deliberately contains NO answer index and NO explanations. That is so you can present the questions without leaking the answers. Call `check_answer` with the item id and the chosen option to get the answer, why it fits, and why each distractor fails. Input: `count` (1-20, default 5) — an out-of-range count is REFUSED rather than clamped, so you learn the limit. `difficulty` is foundation|core|stretch. `theme` is science|humanities|social-science|literature. `seed` makes the draw reproducible: the same seed always returns the same items, so a practice session can be replayed or shared. Format note: these test inference from context, which is how the current digital SAT asks about vocabulary — not recall of definitions. Each item is a sentence with one word blanked and four options.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "count": {
      "description": "How many items, 1-20, default 5. An out-of-range value is refused, not clamped.",
      "type": "integer",
      "minimum": -9007199254740991,
      "maximum": 9007199254740991
    },
    "difficulty": {
      "description": "Filter by difficulty.",
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "foundation",
        "core",
        "stretch"
      ]
    },
    "theme": {
      "description": "Filter by passage flavour.",
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "science",
        "humanities",
        "social-science",
        "literature"
      ]
    },
    "seed": {
      "description": "Makes the draw reproducible — the same seed always returns the same items, so a session can be replayed or shared. Omit for a random set.",
      "type": "integer",
      "minimum": -9007199254740991,
      "maximum": 9007199254740991
    }
  },
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
}
🟢check_answer(id, choice)

Check an answer to a practice item and get the teaching content. Returns whether the choice was correct, which option was right, why it fits the sentence specifically, why the chosen option was wrong, and the reason EVERY distractor fails. Read the distractor reasons out to the learner even when they answered correctly. Knowing why the tempting wrong answer was tempting is the part that transfers to the next question; being told "correct" teaches nothing. Input: `id` from a draw response, and `choice` as the zero-based index of the selected option.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "id": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The item id from a draw response."
    },
    "choice": {
      "type": "integer",
      "minimum": -9007199254740991,
      "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      "description": "Zero-based index of the chosen option."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "id",
    "choice"
  ],
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
}
🟢generate_items(source, count, model, difficulty)

Generate new practice items from a passage the learner supplies — their own reading, or the material they got wrong. This is the PAID tier and it costs real money per call, unlike the curated bank. Prefer `draw_items` unless the learner specifically needs questions from their own material. `model` is a priced choice: "economy" at $0.002 per item (Fast and cheap. Good enough for straightforward vocabulary in clear prose.); "standard" at $0.008 per item (Better at writing distractors that are genuinely tempting, which is the hard part of a good practice item.). Pick economy for straightforward prose and standard when the distractors need to be genuinely tempting, which is the hard part of a good question. Limits: passage 200 characters minimum, and `count` at most 5 per call. Generation is capped at 10 calls per caller per day, separately from the free quota. Generated items are NOT reviewed by a person. Every response carries a caveat saying so. Check the answer and the distractor reasons before giving them to a learner — a generated question with two defensible answers is worse than no question. Returns 503 when generation is not enabled on the deployment; fall back to `draw_items`.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "source": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "A passage of at least 200 characters. The learner's own reading."
    },
    "count": {
      "description": "How many items, 1-5. Default 3.",
      "type": "integer",
      "minimum": -9007199254740991,
      "maximum": 9007199254740991
    },
    "model": {
      "description": "Priced choice. \"economy\" is cheaper; \"standard\" writes more tempting distractors. Default economy.",
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "economy",
        "standard"
      ]
    },
    "difficulty": {
      "description": "Target difficulty.",
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "foundation",
        "core",
        "stretch"
      ]
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "source"
  ],
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
}

社区

评价此服务器

证据

最近观测

已验证未记录版本3 个工具
已验证未记录版本3 个工具
已验证未记录版本3 个工具