MiniMindsLab MCP Tools

Deterministic MiniMindsLab utilities for AI agents over MCP.

我该使用它吗

质量与安全性

B
描述质量
83%
模式完整度
100%
命名质量
32%
投毒风险
100%
权限匹配度
100%
协议合规性
100%

发现(22)

  • LOWTool 'accessible-name-and-label-regression-diff' description lacks action verb在 accessible-name-and-label-regression-diff 中
  • LOWTool 'css-stacking-context-inspector' description lacks action verb在 css-stacking-context-inspector 中
  • LOWTool 'html-duplicate-id-and-aria-reference-checker' description lacks action verb在 html-duplicate-id-and-aria-reference-checker 中
  • LOWTool 'accessible-name-and-label-regression-diff' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 accessible-name-and-label-regression-diff 中
  • LOWTool 'accessible-name-and-label-regression-diff' name length outside 3-30 range在 accessible-name-and-label-regression-diff 中
  • LOWTool 'api-breaking-change-diff-viewer' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 api-breaking-change-diff-viewer 中
  • LOWTool 'api-breaking-change-diff-viewer' name length outside 3-30 range在 api-breaking-change-diff-viewer 中
  • LOWTool 'api-pagination-and-cursor-consistency-checker' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 api-pagination-and-cursor-consistency-checker 中
  • LOWTool 'api-pagination-and-cursor-consistency-checker' name length outside 3-30 range在 api-pagination-and-cursor-consistency-checker 中
  • LOWTool 'conference-badge-readability-tester' doesn't follow camelCase/snake_case在 conference-badge-readability-tester 中

基于对工具定义和协议合规性的自动分析。

上下文开销

~3,800token 数(工具定义)
~4.4 KB典型响应大小
对注意力有显著影响(占 128k 上下文窗口的 2.97%)

这是每次将服务器的工具加载到模型上下文窗口时所消耗的大致 token 数。数值越高,可用于其他任务的注意力就越少。

安装

一键安装

将以下内容添加到你的 `claude_desktop_config.json` 文件中:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tools": {
      "url": "https://mcp.minimindslab.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

远程端点

https://mcp.minimindslab.com/mcpstreamable-http

它能做什么

工具清单

工具(10)

🟢 只读🟡 写入🔴 删除⚪ 未知
🟢accessible-name-and-label-regression-diff(old_dom_snippet, new_dom_snippet, include_description, match_by_selector, show_element_paths)

Teams need to know when a code change silently breaks accessible names, labels, or descriptions on interactive elements.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "old_dom_snippet": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Required. Must contain a non-empty HTML or DOM fragment. Plain text is treated as literal markup input, not rendered content."
    },
    "new_dom_snippet": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Required. Must contain a non-empty HTML or DOM fragment. Plain text is treated as literal markup input, not rendered content."
    },
    "include_description": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, compare accessible descriptions in addition to accessible names and labels."
    },
    "match_by_selector": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, element matching prefers stable CSS-like selector identity when available; otherwise fallback matching is used."
    },
    "show_element_paths": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, output includes deterministic element path strings for matched and problematic nodes."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "old_dom_snippet",
    "new_dom_snippet",
    "include_description",
    "match_by_selector",
    "show_element_paths"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "regression_list": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "ambiguous_elements": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "missing_label_list": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "element_path_report": {
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true
    },
    "accessibility_summary": {
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": true
}
🟢api-breaking-change-diff-viewer(old_contract_json, new_contract_json, strict_mode, show_path_details, ignore_additive_changes)

Developers need to know whether a new API contract breaks existing clients before they merge or publish it.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "old_contract_json": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Must be valid JSON text representing the previous contract version. The tool must reject empty input and invalid JSON with a parse error."
    },
    "new_contract_json": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Must be valid JSON text representing the proposed contract version. The tool must reject empty input and invalid JSON with a parse error."
    },
    "strict_mode": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, treat type changes, removed required fields, removed paths, enum narrowing, and object-to-non-object changes as breaking. When false, still report them but additive changes may be separated more prominently."
    },
    "show_path_details": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, include full normalized JSON paths for every finding. When false, keep messages concise while preserving path references in structured results."
    },
    "ignore_additive_changes": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, do not include new optional fields, new array members in additive-only contexts, or other non-breaking additions in the visible change lists."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "old_contract_json",
    "new_contract_json",
    "strict_mode",
    "show_path_details",
    "ignore_additive_changes"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "compatibility_status": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "breaking_changes": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "non_breaking_changes": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "missing_paths": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "type_mismatch_paths": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "enum_violations": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "compatibility_summary": {
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": true
}
🟢api-pagination-and-cursor-consistency-checker(response_samples, pagination_mode, sort_key, page_size, show_item_paths)

Backend and frontend teams need to confirm that paginated API response samples keep page, offset, and cursor behavior consistent across endpoints and edge cases.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "response_samples": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Must contain one or more API response samples in JSON text form. Each sample must parse as an object or array. Empty input is invalid."
    },
    "pagination_mode": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "cursor",
        "page",
        "offset",
        "mixed"
      ],
      "description": "Select the intended pagination contract. 'mixed' means samples may contain more than one pagination style and the checker will verify consistency within each style."
    },
    "sort_key": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional. If provided, must be a non-empty field path such as 'created_at' or 'data.items[].id'. Used as the expected stable ordering key across samples."
    },
    "page_size": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 1,
      "maximum": 1000000,
      "description": "Optional. If provided, must be a positive integer. Used to verify per-page item counts and boundary transitions."
    },
    "show_item_paths": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, output item path references for duplicates, gaps, and boundary findings when they can be inferred from the samples."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "response_samples",
    "pagination_mode"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "pagination_status": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "duplicate_item_flags": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "missing_cursor_flags": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "page_boundary_report": {
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true
    },
    "consistency_summary": {
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": true
}
🟢conference-badge-readability-tester(badge_width_mm, company_text, font_size_pt, name_text, role_text, ...)

Estimates whether a name badge is readable at social distance and flags text that will likely feel too small or too crowded.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "badge_width_mm": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 20,
      "maximum": 300,
      "description": "Must be a finite number between 20 and 300. Values outside the range are invalid."
    },
    "company_text": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Text is required. Leading and trailing whitespace are trimmed. Empty after trimming is invalid."
    },
    "font_size_pt": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 6,
      "maximum": 72,
      "description": "Must be a finite number between 6 and 72. Non-numeric or out-of-range values are invalid."
    },
    "name_text": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Text is required. Leading and trailing whitespace are trimmed. Empty after trimming is invalid."
    },
    "role_text": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional text. If provided, it is trimmed. Empty string is treated as blank."
    },
    "viewing_distance_cm": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 20,
      "maximum": 500,
      "description": "Must be a finite number between 20 and 500. Values outside the range are invalid."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "badge_width_mm",
    "company_text",
    "font_size_pt",
    "name_text",
    "viewing_distance_cm"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "badge_summary": {
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true
    },
    "crowding_warnings": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "line_break_suggestions": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "readability_score": {
      "type": "number"
    },
    "sizing_notes": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": true
}
🟢css-stacking-context-inspector(css_snippet, html_snippet, selected_element, show_paint_order, show_stacking_context_chain)

Frontend developers need to understand why an element is visually hidden behind another even when z-index seems correct.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "css_snippet": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Required. Must contain one or more CSS rules. Trim leading and trailing whitespace. If empty, show a validation error and do not compute results."
    },
    "html_snippet": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Required. Must contain HTML markup for the inspected layout. Trim leading and trailing whitespace. If empty, show a validation error and do not compute results."
    },
    "selected_element": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Required. Must be a CSS selector or element reference token that matches at least one element in the provided HTML snippet. If no match is found, return a selection error."
    },
    "show_paint_order": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Boolean flag. When true, include a paint order trace. When false, omit the detailed trace but still compute the main layering explanation."
    },
    "show_stacking_context_chain": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Boolean flag. When true, include the ancestry of stacking context creators from root to selected element. When false, include only the summarized cause."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "css_snippet",
    "html_snippet",
    "selected_element",
    "show_paint_order",
    "show_stacking_context_chain"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "stacking_context_chain": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "paint_order_trace": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "layering_explanation": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "clipping_and_containment_warnings": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "likely_fix_hints": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "diagnostic_summary": {
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": true
}
🟢html-duplicate-id-and-aria-reference-checker(html_snippet, check_duplicate_ids, check_aria_references, show_element_paths)

Developers need to catch duplicate IDs and broken ARIA relationships that silently break accessibility and scripting.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "html_snippet": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Accept raw HTML or DOM snippet text. Must be non-empty after trimming. Parse as HTML fragment in document order. Script execution is never allowed."
    },
    "check_duplicate_ids": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, report every duplicated id value with all matching element locations. When false, duplicate-id analysis is skipped and duplicate outputs are empty."
    },
    "check_aria_references": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, scan ARIA ID reference attributes and validate each referenced id against the parsed fragment. When false, aria-reference analysis is skipped and broken-reference outputs are empty."
    },
    "show_element_paths": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, include stable element paths for duplicate and broken-reference findings. When false, path fields are omitted from per-finding detail but summary counts still compute."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "html_snippet",
    "check_duplicate_ids",
    "check_aria_references",
    "show_element_paths"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "validation_status": {
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true
    },
    "duplicate_id_groups": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "broken_aria_references": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "missing_target_list": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "element_path_report": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": true
}
🟢json-contract-compatibility-checker(contract_json, sample_json, show_path_details, strict_mode)

Developers need to confirm that a sample API response still matches a contract, including required fields, type expectations, enum constraints, and unexpected shape changes.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "contract_json": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Must be valid JSON text. The contract must be an object. Supported contract keys are name/title, type, required, properties, items, enum, const, additionalProperties, and nested combinations of those. Missing or invalid JSON must produce a parse error."
    },
    "sample_json": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Must be valid JSON text. The sample must be a JSON object, array, string, number, boolean, or null. Missing or invalid JSON must produce a parse error."
    },
    "show_path_details": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, mismatch outputs must include explicit JSONPath-like paths such as $.user.name. When false, the report may summarize issues without omitting the required output lists."
    },
    "strict_mode": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, extra paths not allowed by the contract are reported as mismatches whenever additionalProperties is false or omitted for object branches that define properties. When false, extra paths are still listed in extra_paths but do not change overall compatibility unless another required rule fails."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "contract_json",
    "sample_json",
    "show_path_details",
    "strict_mode"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "compatibility_status": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "enum_violations": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "extra_paths": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "missing_paths": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "type_mismatch_paths": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": true
}
🟢json-schema-drift-impact-checker(old_json_schema, new_json_schema, sample_payloads, show_path_details, strict_mode)

API and frontend engineers need to know whether a JSON schema change will break real payloads, generated clients, or form bindings before they ship it.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "old_json_schema": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Must be valid JSON text representing the previous schema version. The schema must parse as an object; if parsing fails, show a parse error and stop comparison."
    },
    "new_json_schema": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Must be valid JSON text representing the proposed schema version. The schema must parse as an object; if parsing fails, show a parse error and stop comparison."
    },
    "sample_payloads": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional JSON text. Accept a single JSON value, an array of JSON values, or newline-separated JSON values. Blank input means no sample payload analysis."
    },
    "show_path_details": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Boolean toggle. When true, path-level findings must include explicit JSON Pointer style paths and short evidence notes."
    },
    "strict_mode": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Boolean toggle. When true, treat any added required constraint, narrowed type, removed enum option, reduced allowed array/object shape, or newly forbidden property as breaking."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "old_json_schema",
    "new_json_schema",
    "show_path_details",
    "strict_mode"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "compatibility_status": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "breaking_paths": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "additive_changes": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "potentially_breaking_paths": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "impact_summary": {
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true
    },
    "compatibility_summary": {
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": true
}
🟢json-schema-vs-sample-payload-diff-checker(json_schema, sample_json, additional_properties_mode, strict_types, show_paths)

API builders need to see exactly where a sample payload violates a schema or where the schema does not describe real data.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "json_schema": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Must be valid JSON text representing a JSON Schema document. If parsing fails, show a schema parse error and skip comparison."
    },
    "sample_json": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Must be valid JSON text representing an instance payload. If parsing fails, show a sample parse error and skip comparison."
    },
    "additional_properties_mode": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "schema_default",
        "allow",
        "forbid"
      ],
      "description": "Controls handling of object properties not declared by the schema. schema_default uses the schema's own additionalProperties / unevaluatedProperties rules where supported by the tool. allow ignores extra-property violations. forbid reports extra-property paths even if the schema is permissive."
    },
    "strict_types": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, require exact JSON type matches for object, array, string, number, integer, boolean, and null. Integers must still be numbers with no fractional component. When false, permit only JSON Schema-compatible numeric coercion is not performed; comparison remains type-based but integer and number mismatches are reported with lower severity in the summary only."
    },
    "show_paths": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, include JSON Pointer-style instance paths for every mismatch. When false, still compute paths internally but present concise grouped results."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "json_schema",
    "sample_json",
    "additional_properties_mode",
    "strict_types",
    "show_paths"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "validation_status": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "missing_field_paths": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "type_mismatch_paths": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "enum_violations": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "extra_property_paths": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "summary": {
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": true
}
🟢spreadsheet-merge-conflict-reconciler(sheet_a, sheet_b, match_keys, case_sensitive, trim_whitespace)

Teams need to reconcile two spreadsheet versions and see what changed, what conflicts, and which rows or columns need manual review.

输入模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "sheet_a": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Paste or upload the first sheet snapshot as tabular text. Accept CSV-style or TSV-style rows with a header row. Must contain at least one data row and one header row."
    },
    "sheet_b": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Paste or upload the second sheet snapshot as tabular text. Accept CSV-style or TSV-style rows with a header row. Must contain at least one data row and one header row."
    },
    "match_keys": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Provide one or more column names used to match rows between Sheet A and Sheet B. Separate multiple keys with commas, semicolons, or new lines. Each key must exist in both sheets after normalization."
    },
    "case_sensitive": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When false, row key matching and field comparisons ignore letter case. When true, comparisons preserve letter case exactly."
    },
    "trim_whitespace": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "When true, leading and trailing whitespace is removed from headers, keys, and cell values before matching and comparison. Internal spaces are preserved."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "sheet_a",
    "sheet_b",
    "match_keys",
    "case_sensitive",
    "trim_whitespace"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false
}

输出模式

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "conflict_rows": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "added_rows": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "removed_rows": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "cell_differences": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {}
    },
    "reconciliation_summary": {
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": true
}

社区

评价此服务器

证据

最近观测

已验证未记录版本10 个工具
已验证未记录版本8 个工具
已验证未记录版本7 个工具