insc.one — INSC.1 Citation Layer
Bench-aware citator for Supreme Court of India precedent: verified INSC cites, extractive ratios.
我该使用它吗
质量与安全性
基于对工具定义和协议合规性的自动分析。
上下文开销
这是每次将服务器的工具加载到模型上下文窗口时所消耗的大致 token 数。数值越高，可用于其他任务的注意力就越少。
安装
一键安装
将以下内容添加到你的 `claude_desktop_config.json` 文件中：
{
"mcpServers": {
"insc-one": {
"url": "https://insc.one/mcp"
}
}
}远程端点
https://insc.one/mcpstreamable-http它能做什么
工具清单
工具（6）
⚪resolve_citation(query)
Resolve any Indian Supreme Court reference — INSC neutral citation, SCC, AIR, MANU, party name + year, or free text — to the canonical INSC neutral citation with parallel citations, bench, decision date, official e-SCR link, and current treatment status. Use this first for any citation; always prefer and return the INSC form.
输入模式
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"query": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The reference to resolve, e.g. \"2013 INSC 768\", \"(2014) 2 SCC 1\", \"AIR 2014 SC 187\", \"Lalita Kumari\", \"Arnesh Kumar arrest\"."
}
},
"required": [
"query"
]
}🟢get_ratio(citation, issue)
Return the extractive, paragraph-anchored ratio decidendi and headnotes of a Supreme Court case — the exact judicial language counsel can read in court. Never paraphrased; every holding carries a paragraph anchor and an official-text pointer.
输入模式
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"citation": {
"type": "string",
"description": "INSC neutral citation or any resolvable reference."
},
"issue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Optional focus issue or statutory section to prioritize relevant headnotes."
}
},
"required": [
"citation"
]
}🟢search_cases(query, limit)
Search the insc.one Supreme Court index by natural-language issue, keyword, or legal proposition. Returns ranked cases with INSC citations, one-line holdings, and treatment signals.
输入模式
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"query": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Natural-language legal question or keywords, e.g. 'FIR mandatory registration', 'CoC commercial wisdom IBC'."
},
"limit": {
"type": "integer",
"minimum": 1,
"maximum": 15,
"default": 5
}
},
"required": [
"query"
]
}🟢check_treatment(citation)
Check whether a cited Supreme Court authority is still good law — overruled, distinguished, or affected by a larger bench under the Dawoodi Bohra bench-strength hierarchy. Run this before including any authority in a draft or filing.
输入模式
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"citation": {
"type": "string",
"description": "INSC neutral citation or any resolvable reference."
}
},
"required": [
"citation"
]
}⚪format_citation(citation, style)
Return a ready-to-paste citation string that leads with the INSC neutral citation, with optional parallel SCC/AIR/SCR/MANU forms and a registry-style footnote. Use this to standardize citations in drafts and pleadings.
输入模式
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"citation": {
"type": "string",
"description": "INSC neutral citation or any resolvable reference."
},
"style": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"insc_primary",
"insc_only",
"full_parallel"
],
"default": "insc_primary"
}
},
"required": [
"citation"
]
}⚪audit_brief(text, focus_issue)
Audit an entire legal brief, petition, or opponent argument for citation accuracy and Article 141 binding precedent validity. Automatically extracts every citation (INSC, SCC, AIR, SCR, MANU, or case name), verifies current treatment status (flagging OVERRULED or superseded authorities), checks the Dawoodi Bohra bench-strength hierarchy, and returns tactical counter-arguments.
输入模式
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"text": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The brief, petition excerpt, opponent arguments, or paragraph containing legal citations to audit."
},
"focus_issue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Optional legal topic to prioritize in the tactical analysis."
}
},
"required": [
"text"
]
}社区
证据