Antevo Trademark

Is that brand name taken? Screen the registers and check the opposition window. No account.

我該用這個嗎

品質與安全性

A
說明品質
100%
結構描述完整度
80%
命名品質
80%
汙染風險
100%
權限相符程度
100%
協定合規性
100%

根據工具定義與協定合規性的自動化分析。

上下文成本

~744Token(工具定義)
~397 B典型回應大小
中等的注意力影響(128k 上下文的 0.58%)

這是每次將伺服器的工具載入模型上下文時所消耗的約略 token 數量。數量越高,可用於其他工作的注意力就越少。

安裝

一鍵安裝

將以下內容加入你的 `claude_desktop_config.json` 檔案:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "trademark": {
      "url": "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp"
    }
  }
}

遠端端點

https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcpstreamable-http

它能做什麼

工具清單

工具(4)

🟢 唯讀🟡 寫入🔴 刪除⚪ 未知
🟢screen_mark(mark)

Screen a brand name against the live trademark registers. Free, no account. Returns every mark near it with a similarity tier, plus which registers were checked. This is the first thing to run when someone asks 'is my name taken'.

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "mark": {
      "title": "Mark",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "mark"
  ],
  "title": "screen_markArguments"
}
🟢suggest_classes(description)

Which Nice classes a business like this files in. Free, no account, no database. The question people cannot answer for themselves: not "is my name taken" but "taken in WHAT". Nice has 45 classes and the numbering is opaque — software you download is class 9, software you log into is class 42, and selling other people's goods is class 35 whatever the goods are. Filing in one and not the other is the most expensive routine mistake in the process. Run this BEFORE screen_mark when someone describes a business rather than naming a class: the classes it returns are what makes a screen mean anything. Relay the reasoning, not just the numbers, and keep the closing caveat — this reports how similar businesses file, and their counsel decides what they actually file.

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "description": {
      "title": "Description",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "description"
  ],
  "title": "suggest_classesArguments"
}
🟢holder_read(name)

Who a holder is and how they file — the read on an adversary. Free. Computed from their whole register book: how much of it they let lapse, whether their marks cluster where they trade or spray across unrelated classes, and the leverage that gives counsel. Present the evidence, not just the label — and never call anyone a squatter; that is a legal conclusion we do not assert.

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "name": {
      "title": "Name",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "name"
  ],
  "title": "holder_readArguments"
}
🟢opposition_window(office)

How long you have to oppose a filing in a given trademark office, and from when. Twenty registers, each with the provision the window comes from. The trap this answers: most offices run opposition BEFORE registration, from publication of the application, but a minority — Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Sweden — register the mark first and run the window from publication of the REGISTRATION. Applying one office's rule to another invents a deadline that never existed. Accepts a country name, an office name or a two-letter code ('japan', 'JP', 'EU').

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "office": {
      "title": "Office",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "office"
  ],
  "title": "opposition_windowArguments"
}

建議的提示詞

retrieve_data
Get details about [item] from Antevo Trademark
預期的工具: holder_read
fetch_info
Fetch [information type] using Antevo Trademark
預期的工具: holder_read

社群

為此伺服器評分

證據

近期觀測

已驗證未記錄版本4 個工具
已驗證未記錄版本4 個工具