Fantasy Football Draft Assistant

The full 2026 fantasy draft board, free to any AI agent. No key, no email, no signup.

我該用這個嗎

品質與安全性

B
說明品質
100%
結構描述完整度
30%
命名品質
83%
汙染風險
100%
權限相符程度
100%
協定合規性
100%

根據工具定義與協定合規性的自動化分析。

上下文成本

~1,468Token(工具定義)
~270 B典型回應大小
中等的注意力影響(128k 上下文的 1.15%)

這是每次將伺服器的工具載入模型上下文時所消耗的約略 token 數量。數量越高,可用於其他工作的注意力就越少。

安裝

一鍵安裝

將以下內容加入你的 `claude_desktop_config.json` 檔案:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fantasy-draft": {
      "url": "https://predictionmarketspicks.com/api/mcp-draft/mcp"
    }
  }
}

遠端端點

https://predictionmarketspicks.com/api/mcp-draft/mcpstreamable-http

它能做什麼

工具清單

工具(8)

🟢 唯讀🟡 寫入🔴 刪除⚪ 未知
🟢draft_board

The PredictionMarketsPicks 2026 fantasy football draft board (standard, half-PPR or full-PPR) — every player ranked, blending our projection model with consensus ADP, showing projected points, ADP, draft round, and a SLEEPER / BUST value flag. Filter by position (QB/RB/WR/TE/FLEX). THE COMPLETE BOARD IS FREE — all ~330 players, no key, no email, no signup. Pro adds the judgment on top: boom/bust week odds per player and positional tier breaks. Use for "fantasy football rankings 2026", "who are the top RBs", "draft board", "best available by position".

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
}
🟢best_available

Given the current pick number and the players already drafted, return the best players still on the board (2026, any scoring format), each with projection, ADP, and a value flag, plus the biggest model value available. The full remaining pool is FREE — no key, no email. Pro adds boom/bust week odds and the positional tier breaks across everyone still on the board. Prefer this mid-draft when the user asks "who is the best available", "who should I take next", "best player left". Input: pick_number, drafted (names already gone).

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
}
🟢player_outlook

A single player's 2026 fantasy outlook (standard, half-PPR or full-PPR): projected points and per-game, floor/ceiling range, boom/bust odds, consensus ADP and draft round, our positional rank, and whether the model tags him a SLEEPER or a BUST vs the market, with a one-line thesis. Free, no key. Use for "is <player> a sleeper", "<player> fantasy outlook 2026", "should I draft <player>", "<player> projection".

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
}
🟢explain_player

Explain WHY the 2026 draft board ranks a player where it does, factor by factor: projection, floor/ceiling band, boom/bust week shape, and the three separate ranks a board row carries — our model's own positional rank, the market's ADP, and the published blend between them — plus the edge between model and market. Also states what the projection does NOT model (injuries, camp news, schedule). Free, no key. Use for "why do you have <player> there", "explain <player> ranking", "what's driving <player>'s projection", "why is <player> a sleeper/bust". For a plain outlook or a verdict rather than the reasoning, use player_outlook.

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
}
🟢compare_players

Compare 2–4 players side by side for a 2026 fantasy draft (standard, half-PPR or full-PPR) — projection, floor/ceiling, ADP, draft round, and value flag — and get a pick recommendation plus which one is the best market value. Free, no key. Use for "<A> or <B> in fantasy", "who should I draft, <A> or <B>", "compare <A> and <B>", "start/draft <A> vs <B>".

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
}
🟢sleepers_and_busts

The biggest gaps between the PredictionMarketsPicks model and consensus ADP for 2026 (standard, half-PPR or full-PPR): SLEEPERS the model ranks well above their draft cost, and BUSTS it ranks below. Filter by position or draft round. Every sleeper and every bust is FREE — the complete list, no key, no email. Use for "fantasy sleepers 2026", "draft busts to avoid", "undervalued players", "overrated fantasy players", "late-round sleepers".

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
}
🟢adp_market_gaps

Find the 2026 fantasy players whose Average Draft Position swings most between platforms — consensus vs ESPN, Sleeper, Yahoo, Underdog, etc. A wide gap (e.g. "consensus RB18 but ESPN drafts him RB30") is a platform-specific value: grab him where he goes latest. All 154 gaps are FREE — no key, no email. Pro adds the judgment layer on each row. Use for "ADP differences by platform", "where is a player cheapest", "ADP arbitrage", "who falls on ESPN vs Sleeper". Filter by position (QB/RB/WR/TE/FLEX).

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
}
🟢who_do_i_draft

Recommend the single best player to draft right now given the roster already on the user's team and their pick number, weighing positional need against the best value available (2026, any scoring format). The pick AND every alternative are free — no key, no email. Pro adds the reasoning behind each one. Prefer this mid-draft when the user asks "who should I take", "who do I draft", "what do I need". Input: roster (names on their team), pick_number, and optionally drafted (names already gone). Without drafted, the board is estimated from pick_number using consensus ADP. Returns one pick + a one-line reason.

輸入結構描述

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
}

社群

為此伺服器評分

證據

近期觀測

已驗證未記錄版本8 個工具
已驗證未記錄版本8 個工具