Own Your Mind DeAI assessments

Signed, independent scores and claim checks for decentralised AI projects. Read-only, no auth.

Should I use this

Quality & Safety

A
Description quality
97%
Schema completeness
68%
Naming quality
97%
Poisoning risk
100%
Permission match
100%
Protocol compliance
100%

Based on automated analysis of tool definitions and protocol compliance.

Context Cost

~902Tokens (tool definitions)
~570 BTypical response size
Moderate attention impact (0.70% of 128k context)

This is the approximate number of tokens consumed each time the server's tools are loaded into a model's context. Higher counts reduce the attention available for other tasks.

Install

One-Click Install

Add this to your `claude_desktop_config.json` file:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "oym-substrate": {
      "url": "https://agent-trust.ownyourmind.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Remote endpoints

https://agent-trust.ownyourmind.ai/mcpstreamable-http

What it can do

Tool inventory

Tools (7)

🟢 Read-only🟡 Write🔴 Delete⚪ Unknown
🟢list_projects(category, status)

List every assessed decentralised AI project with its dual scores, grades and assessment level. Optional filters: category (compute|data|inference|storage| agent|platform|other) and status (e.g. active). Returns summaries only; call get_project_assessment for the full record. `_rule` states the honesty contract.

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "category": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Category"
    },
    "status": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Status"
    }
  },
  "title": "list_projectsArguments"
}
🟢get_project_assessment(slug, full)

One project's assessment: dual scores + breakdowns, integrity level, verdict counts and every checked claim or finding in brief, plus review_url to cite and the attestation envelope. full=true returns the whole signed record instead (adds data sources and the primary-data snapshot; over 100K characters for the deepest reviews).

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "slug": {
      "title": "Slug",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "full": {
      "default": false,
      "title": "Full",
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "slug"
  ],
  "title": "get_project_assessmentArguments"
}
🟢get_freedom_breakdown(slug)

The 6-dimension Freedom score for a project (infrastructure, governance, token distribution, censorship resistance, data sovereignty, open source), each with score/max and the evidence behind it, plus grade and total /100.

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "slug": {
      "title": "Slug",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "slug"
  ],
  "title": "get_freedom_breakdownArguments"
}
🟢get_returns_breakdown(slug)

The 5-dimension Returns score for a project (token utility, value accrual, supply dynamics, revenue sustainability, liquidity & access), each with score/max and evidence, plus grade and total /100.

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "slug": {
      "title": "Slug",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "slug"
  ],
  "title": "get_returns_breakdownArguments"
}
🟢get_integrity_verdicts(slug, verdict, offset, limit)

Every claim we checked for a project against independent data: the reconciliations (reported figure vs our independent value, method, verdict, evidence link), metric flags, and emission honesty. Carries the verdict vocabulary, assessment levels and `_rule` verbatim so a caller reports 'not-assessed' honestly and never invents a 'verified'. Optional verdict filter (e.g. 'inflated', 'outdated') narrows the rows. Paged at 25 rows: when next_offset is set, call again with offset=next_offset.

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "slug": {
      "title": "Slug",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "verdict": {
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "null"
        }
      ],
      "default": null,
      "title": "Verdict"
    },
    "offset": {
      "default": 0,
      "title": "Offset",
      "type": "integer"
    },
    "limit": {
      "default": 25,
      "title": "Limit",
      "type": "integer"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "slug"
  ],
  "title": "get_integrity_verdictsArguments"
}
⚪compare_projects(slugs, axis)

Compare several projects on one axis ('freedom' or 'returns'), aligned per dimension so an agent can rank them like-for-like. Returns each project's per- dimension score/max, total, grade and assessment level.

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "slugs": {
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "title": "Slugs",
      "type": "array"
    },
    "axis": {
      "default": "freedom",
      "title": "Axis",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "slugs"
  ],
  "title": "compare_projectsArguments"
}
🟢get_agent_trust_snapshot

The latest OYM agent-trust index summary (ERC-8004 agent identity, reputation and x402 settlement reconciliation): observations with a methodology version and scope notes, never verdicts. Carries `data_as_of` — this data refreshes only periodically.

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "title": "get_agent_trust_snapshotArguments"
}

Community

Rate this Server

Evidence

Recent observations

verifiedversion not recorded7 tools