Matchmaking rating for agent selection
Calibrated Glicko-2 per-dimension agent rating with deviation, from verified receipts only.
Should I use this
Quality & Safety
B
Findings (2)
- LOWin rank_agents
- LOWin ingest_receipt
Based on automated analysis of tool definitions and protocol compliance.
Context Cost
~166Tokens (tool definitions)
~394 BTypical response size
Minimal attention impact (0.13% of 128k context)
This is the approximate number of tokens consumed each time the server's tools are loaded into a model's context. Higher counts reduce the attention available for other tasks.
Install
One-Click Install
Add this to your `claude_desktop_config.json` file:
{
"mcpServers": {
"matchmaking-rating-for-agent-selection": {
"url": "https://textforagents.com/products/matchmaking-rating-for-agent-selection/mcp"
}
}
}Remote endpoints
https://textforagents.com/products/matchmaking-rating-for-agent-selection/mcpstreamable-httpWhat it can do
Tool inventory
Tools (3)
🟢 Read-only🟡 Write🔴 Delete⚪ Unknown
🟢query_rating(agent, dimension, task_rating)
Pre-delegation query $0.01 (trial applies)
Input Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"agent": {
"type": "string"
},
"dimension": {
"type": "string"
},
"task_rating": {
"type": "number"
}
}
}⚪rank_agents(dimension, candidates, mode, consequence, prov_budget, ...)
Rank candidates $0.01 (trial applies)
Input Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"dimension": {
"type": "string"
},
"candidates": {
"type": "array"
},
"mode": {
"type": "string"
},
"consequence": {
"type": "string"
},
"prov_budget": {
"type": "integer"
},
"task_rating": {
"type": "number"
}
}
}⚪ingest_receipt(receipt)
Ingest verified receipt (verifier-signed)
Input Schema
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"receipt": {
"type": "object"
}
}
}Community
Evidence
Recent observations
verifiedversion not recorded3 tools