review-mcp

Multi-model code review: a panel of models + detectors return a pass/fail verdict. Paid via x402.

Should I use this

Quality & Safety

A
Description quality
100%
Schema completeness
100%
Naming quality
100%
Poisoning risk
100%
Permission match
100%
Protocol compliance
100%

Based on automated analysis of tool definitions and protocol compliance.

Context Cost

~469Tokens (tool definitions)
~2.1 KBTypical response size
Minimal attention impact (0.37% of 128k context)

This is the approximate number of tokens consumed each time the server's tools are loaded into a model's context. Higher counts reduce the attention available for other tasks.

Install

One-Click Install

Add this to your `claude_desktop_config.json` file:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "review-mcp": {
      "url": "https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Remote endpoints

https://review-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcpstreamable-http

What it can do

Tool inventory

Tools (1)

🟢 Read-only🟡 Write🔴 Delete⚪ Unknown
🟡review_code(payload, language, context, depth)

Adversarial multi-model code review. Submit a diff, a module, or a spec+implementation and get back a structured pass/fail verdict with each issue's type, severity, location, explanation, and suggested fix. Why call this instead of reviewing your own output: a single model shares its blind spots with itself. This routes your code through a panel of *different* models plus a set of deterministic detectors, catching what self-review misses — path/contract violations, module incoherence (dangling imports, broken cross-references), syntax and call-arity regressions in a diff's post-image, and 'prose instead of tool calls' (output that describes an action rather than emitting it). The panel adds semantic judgment on top and never overrides a deterministic finding. Call it before shipping or merging, as a second opinion on a risky change, or as a gate in an autonomous build loop. Choose depth='fast' (one model, low latency) or 'deep' (full panel, higher recall). Deep review audits files of any size in milestone chunks so every panel model contributes; the price (shown in the 402) and the payment window scale with file size. Per-call limit ~1,600 lines — larger inputs return 413, so split by file/module and call once per file. Paid per call via x402 (USDC on Base); the price is announced in the 402 response before any charge.

Input Schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "payload": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "a unified diff, a complete module/file, or a spec plus its implementation (include enough context lines for diffs)."
    },
    "language": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "primary language of the payload (e.g. \"typescript\", \"python\")."
    },
    "context": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "optional spec/intent, related interfaces, constraints, or what the change should do."
    },
    "depth": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "fast",
        "deep"
      ],
      "description": "\"fast\" = single-model, low latency; \"deep\" = full panel, higher recall (default \"deep\")."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "payload",
    "language"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": false,
  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
}

Community

Rate this Server

Evidence

Recent observations

verifiedversion not recorded1 tools
verifiedversion not recorded1 tools
verifiedversion not recorded1 tools
verifiedversion not recorded1 tools
verifiedversion not recorded1 tools
verifiedversion not recorded1 tools
verifiedversion not recorded1 tools